Originally posted by: surabhi01
Anupama is not hypocrite here in padhik marriage Anupama clearly told padhik that Jo galti toshu and kinjal ne ki thi use to tum dono seekhoge but nahi tum dono ne toshu aur kinjal ki galti se na seekh ke balki unki galtiyon ko dhoraya
In toshu and kinjal ke time anupama ne clearly bola tha ki bhaag ke shaadi karke tum dono ne galti ki
And I have watch those episode that is why I am saying these
There is lot of difference in pakhi and kinjal nature. Kinjal was never freeloader .kinjal might get run away but at least she is not freeloader .she has study hard and try to find out job and even doing job .she is not eating for free .kinjal was not greedy .she did not demand from her mother rakhi ki meri luxurious shaadi karaao .
But where as pakhi is totally freeloader as well as greedy even don't want to continue her studies aur upar se anuj ke paise pe right jama rahi thi
Kinjal is very much better than pakhi
Baat galti ki nahin hain, obviously galti ki hai, but it's about how she reacted in both the instances. Also galti sirf PAdhik ne nahin ki, Anupamaa and both the families ne ki hai by putting pressure on the young couple to seperate inspite of seeing its results in kintosh case. Kinjal ne bhi wahi galti ki thi, Rakhi ko bhi bohot gussa aaya tha, but that time she supported kinjal and came in between her and Rakhi. So she is a hypocrite, jab baat khud ki beti pe aayi then she lost her cool and started lecturing, scolding, yelling at Pakhi.
Why they repeated kintosh's mistake? Because everyone was against their relationship with Barkha deciding to send Adhik to US and Vanraj sending Pakhi away to some other city hence causing both to panic which was the same case for KinTosh. She said KinTosh ne galti ki thi but she also did their aarti and welcomed them when they came back while Pakhi and Adhik were treated very harshly.
Kinjal didn't demand from Rakhi that she wanted a luxurious wedding but Rakhi wanted to give her a luxurious wedding, Rakhi wanted to bestow all the luxuries possible on Kinjal irrespective of whether she wanted them or not and that is the difference between Rakhi and Anupamaa. Inspite of all the insults directed towards Rakhi from Kinjal she never abandoned Kinjal the way Anupamaa did in case of Pakhi. Anupamaa thinks whatever she did will help Pakhi change for the good? Sorry but that is not how it works, handling a daughter like Pakhi who is obviously materialistic and spoilt from childhood requires a different approach and Anupamaa. Throwing her out of the house will only make her worse as she will harbour hatred towards everyone for the same reason given how Paritosh who is also a freeloader and has done worse is still in the house.
Kinjal and Pakhi are very different but no Kinjal is not better than Pakhi she is the same or even worse when it comes to Rakhi her own mother in terms of insolence but yes she is independent financially, pakhi is a freeloader because she isnt earning yet but then again Kinjal is a graduate, she found love after she graduated otherwise even that Dimple eloped and married when is still in college like Pakhi who hasn't even completed her education so what exactly is Pakhi supposed to do other than contributing to household chores. Had both the families not vehemently opposed their relationship to the point of forcefully trying to separate them then none of this would have happened as it did in KinTosh's case, so why didn't Anupamaa and the rest learn anything here themselves especially after witnessing the same in case of KinTosh?
Leave Pakhi, she was even lecturing Dimple and Nirmit over eloping and marrying on how parents are bound to be angry when Dimple revealed she was disowned for doing so. Then why did she never feel this way in case of Rakhi Dave or try to understand her anger 2 years back when Kinjal did the exact same thing but rather jumped to support Kinjal and did her aarti at the doorstep?
Edited by Rein123 - 2 years ago
26