Originally posted by: Bodhianveshika
True.
Actually Anupama and the Shahs are a luck lot.
1. A space for dance academy/cafe with no rentals.
2. A "loan" of 40 Lakhs with NO collateral, no paperwork or no fear of a Recovery Agent in the event of a missed EMI.
3. An additional "loan" towards the Dance Academy. Clearly, the Dance Academy is not yielding profits.
4. Sponsored Global shows and marketing with no expenses or investment.
Now imagine a woman who walks off a 25 year old marriage with No alimony, No savings, No source of income. Let's think that there is an inheritance in the form of a workshop re-modelled to a Dance Academy/Cafe.
Which Business takes off such that it breaks even let alone earns profits to support an EMI, later a rent of the house Anupama stayed, her medical expenses, daily expenses and expenses of travel and accommodation of outstation and overseas shows?
Which new business gets sponsorship for so many shows with no publicity?
What does ALL of this define?