How is PaAdhik any different from MaAn?

Did not MaAn go on a picnic before getting married where they hugged for the very first time?

Anu was living in the same house with Anuj before getting married to him. She hugged him multiple times. She kissed on his hand, she let him kiss her on her forehead and hand. How were they any different from PaAdhik? The production of estrogen and progesterone is much lower in a 45+ woman than a 21 years old woman, so Anu was able stay in Maryada while Pakhi may not be.

Pakhi is not from any conservative family where everyone stays in Maryada. She has seen her parents and her siblings do what she is doing, then what's her fault? Every women may not desire a career, some may desire to be a housewife. The family is over reacting.

Difference between Maan and padhik .Maan were not dependent on family they are able to handle their own situation .both have reach to point if they face any problem they cam handle their own situation

But that in not case in case pf padhik .paakhi is not in position right now handle situation if she face any big problem

Originally posted by: surabhi01

Difference between Maan and padhik .Maan were not dependent on family they are able to handle their own situation .both have reach to point if they face any problem they cam handle their own situation

But that in not case in case pf padhik .paakhi is not in position right now handle situation if she face any big problem

Kissing and hugging and live in toh koi bhi kar sakta hai like anupama and anuj did . Without Career and dependent log bhi kissing hugging live in kar sakte hai so it can’t be considered as difference.

Regarding handling situation, this is subjective and be considered as reason.

Originally posted by: MOTHERHOOD

Did not MaAn go on a picnic before getting married where they hugged for the very first time?

Anu was living in the same house with Anuj before getting married to him. She hugged him multiple times. She kissed on his hand, she let him kiss her on her forehead and hand. How were they any different from PaAdhik? The production of estrogen and progesterone is much lower in a 45+ woman than a 21 years old woman, so Anu was able stay in Maryada while Pakhi may not be.

Pakhi is not from any conservative family where everyone stays in Maryada. She has seen her parents and her siblings do what she is doing, then what's her fault? Every women may not desire a career, some may desire to be a housewife. The family is over reacting.

inka pyaar aradhna

baaki sabka vaasna !!!😉

maa chilla chilla kar keh sakti hai, mishter shah ne pyaar kiya kavya se, mera Pyaar radha-krishna ka pyaar toh 21 yr ki beti ab Himalaya par jaa kar bhajan toh gaane se rahi

Aur kya pata, PA anupama ke 1st karvachauuth ke liye dress tayar kar rahr ho jaise MaAN kapde repair kar rahe the raat ko Baabaapuji ki 50th Anniversary ke liye.

Kya kare woh bhi, Inke paas apna personal flat bhi toh nahi hai.

samar , nandini ke paas bhi flat tha..

Biggest difference

Anu & Anuj were not virgins. They had been in relationships so were 'broken' in

Pakhi is a virginal 21 yr old ...and God forbid she lose her V card before marriage ...ESP since she is a girl and daughter of the so esteemed Shah Phamily

I don't think anupama has objection because of this reason ki boy aur girl ka mlina shaadi se pehle ache Sanskaar mein nahi aata I

I think anupama has objection because she fear the consequence of this

Considering Pakhi to be 21, an adult who is mature to marry anyone by law, Anupama is definitely interfering. However in general Indian context, many 21-23 year olds are actually living extended teenage. But instead of allowing them to mature and take charge of their lives, they keep dictating the course.

Anu is concerned Pakhi being too young to have sex, when she herself was a mother at that age. It is understandable that she doesn't want Pakhi to get struck in the same cycle, but her approach is so wrong. If Anu is worried about unplanned pregnancy for Pakhi then she should educate her about consent, safe sex and contraception. Not ban her from any form of meaningful relationship. Women are humans too, they have desires and fantasies. Not all men are sex starved animals who manipulate women to give in. This could have been a good teaching moment for audience, let's see if they deliver something meaningful

Who will raise child of pakhi when pakhi and adhik not at all earning kis base pe pakhi aur adhk marriage karenge when none of them earning .to kya anupama aur anuj inke kapde aur khane aur bache paalme ka kharcha uthayenge ?

of course there is two solutions already ready ya to bache ko abort kardo ya phir bache ko anathashram mein bhej do ?

Originally posted by: Shri_12

Considering Pakhi to be 21, an adult who is mature to marry anyone by law, Anupama is definitely interfering. However in general Indian context, many 21-23 year olds are actually living extended teenage. But instead of allowing them to mature and take charge of their lives, they keep dictating the course.

Anu is concerned Pakhi being too young to have sex, when she herself was a mother at that age. It is understandable that she doesn't want Pakhi to get struck in the same cycle, but her approach is so wrong. If Anu is worried about unplanned pregnancy for Pakhi then she should educate her about consent, safe sex and contraception. Not ban her from any form of meaningful relationship. Women are humans too, they have desires and fantasies. Not all men are sex-starved animals who manipulate women to give in. This could have been a good teaching moment for audience, let's see if they deliver something meaningful

I hope they treat this track appropriately -if they are showing some sort of a social message - especially in 2022 and in the context of Shah family like Alisha said, Pakhi is not from a conservative family but definitely a hypocritical family regarding values.

In my opinion - no one has the right to force Pakhi to do or not do anything - to go out with Adhik, to have or not have sex, she's an adult and can make her own decision whether they are right or wrong only time will tell.

Also, at the most parents can do is advise their children, guide them, thru past experiences and discuss with them openly - Communication is the key, and discussing outcomes is the key. As one of y'all mentioned Anupamaa was married at 16ish so if having sex at that age (in 1990s) is not an issue then in 2022 at 19/20yr age shouldn't be either. Rather than banning exploring one's body, parents should guide her on how to safely explore be it through contraception or being safe, not being inebriated, or how to choose the right partner etc not just saying NO.

The main missing point I feel Anupama should address is lying/dishonesty & breaking trust - everything else is secondary -

PS: I didn't understand maryada in the context of when Anu was exploring her relationship with Anuj - they were not in any committed relationship, they are consenting adults (and not virgins either - not that it matters) - why can't they have consensual sex - what Maryada is she talking about?

Simple si baat hai,we are expecting too much from this regressive show,but even if they do show all this,it won't work with the older audience like my Mom & Grandmother😆They'll term it as "immoral",because unfortunately even now sex before marriage or even the thought of it is still a grave sin in India☢️