"Stupid Ppl are more Dangerous than Evil ones coz Evil can be fought🤐 - Page 12

Originally posted by: RainFire125

In hindsight I will say that she has voice notes with her hat she can make people listen, but again that voive note is very generic and it does not point out anything at all towards V unless you know him very well. Only Anuj will understand the intent behind that voice note, Mukku will not.

So she can show them to ANuj and I am really not able to think why she did not unless she knows that Anuj will act out. So here I have not much justification to be frank.

Sunny, Ayushi, Arya, Ridz any thing you can think off - the voice notes part. I mean lets not say that she is an idiot or a fool, are writers wanting to show that at this junction??? She is in her character in the sense she does not blurt out or just share things. She thinks through herself first and tries to see what she can do. Now is it that the writers want to make Anu realize that this is a fault of hers that she needs to break from, that too when she has a man like Anuj with her now????

See the cat is already out. Anuj already know what vanraj is upto, the voice notes do not make any sense as mukku will not understand coz she does not know vanraj.

No particular justification but Anu being her character tries to do first by herself later she will involve Anuj if not handled. Plus knowing Anuj protective towards his loved ones, he will behave rationally, was her concern.

https://twitter.com/Miz_jain/status/1489517664917946368?s=20&t=yHVwBUSLsqr5hBLt3fAyPw

hotstar walo ne chada li🤪

https://twitter.com/DisneyPlusHS/status/1489154067335360513?s=20&t=TwFOWUcLmhnEUoGkXd632Q

Originally posted by: Bechain_Bulbul

Chill re!😆

I know today's episode or may be upcoming few episodes are going to be heavy and it will affect our brain cells🤪

But its need to be done for the closure of track. End mein hamesha ki tarah anupama lamba bhashan dekar sab theek kar degi🤣

And its not like anuj is called as abuser by makers because they believe him to be a one. Its the dialogue which they have given to vanraj, the real abuser, the real manipulator, the real selfish guy. And with his dirty mind tricks which he has been playing with mukku, he will try to create anuj's image equivalent to a abuser. Mukku was in abusive relationship so obviously she hates abusers. Its vanraj's attempt to put last nail in the siblings relationship.

I know the irony of it as in real abuser calling the humblest and noblest man as abuser has triggered strong reactions from us but its vanraj's game plan, his thoughts not writers personal thoughts.

Absolutely I totally agree yr... It's nothing but my frustration for makers n V....and love ❤ for anuj....unable to hear a single word against him.... That's it... 😀😀😀

Mujhe aaj Anupmaa ke liye bahut bura laga...bechari ke sapne pehle V ki vajah se aur ab mahaan and kabil mukku ki vajah se toot Gye h(shayad) 😭😭😭😭

Originally posted by: tintin0602

I agree partially.

This is more challenging more me bz yaha Anuj ko abuser bola ja raha hai. Yaha uski hard earned money ko target kiya ja raha hai.. This makes me uncomfortable as this is for me more toxic.

Agree on the point that Anu here needs to be at the focal point. But HONESTLY tell me Ayushi that will u be able to enjoy the confession if it comes in all this mess were the negativity is winning?

I will not be able to.

Juhi, u are right in saying that its tough to see negative win in any manner - miniscule, small or big. But if we see our history itself, did not Ravan capture Seetha and keep her in his garden - this was a small win for him, right and this gave reason for Ram to wage war. Similarly, Draupadi was dragged through the Court and was insulted in the worst possible way by the Kauravas. This was a win for them.. Pandavas were helpless and could not do a damn thing... these prove that evil does win at times for the good to shine. If our history only has these, then what can we say when writers resort to the same style of writing a story???

I am not saying that this is the only way!! Ofcourse this is NOT and time and again I have said that simplicity is totally lost now a days and writers do resort to mind games or throwing good people under the bus for a long time and make them suffer to shine evil. I am not for this kind of story telling at all.

So its our choice, we see this through or we stop for some time and resume back when the good has shone above the evil. Take it from me V is far from being down for good. V is also a centric character and he will rise again and fall again till the writers decide to kill his evil or kill him for good.

Originally posted by: RainFire125

Juhi, u are right in saying that its tough to see negative win in any manner - miniscule, small or big. But if we see our history itself, did not Ravan capture Seetha and keep her in his garden - this was a small win for him, right and this gave reason for Ram to wage war. Similarly, Draupadi was dragged through the Court and was insulted in the worst possible way by the Kauravas. This was a win for them.. Pandavas were helpless and could not do a damn thing... these prove that evil does win at times for the good to shine. If our history only has these, then what can we say when writers resort to the same style of writing a story???

I am not saying that this is the only way!! Ofcourse this is NOT and time and again I have said that simplicity is totally lost now a days and writers do resort to mind games or throwing good people under the bus for a long time and make them suffer to shine evil. I am not for this kind of story telling at all.

So its our choice, we see this through or we stop for some time and resume back when the good has shone above the evil. Take it from me V is far from being down for good. V is also a centric character and he will rise again and fall again till the writers decide to kill his evil or kill him for good.

@bold

This was infact also a case of a man considering his wife as property and pawning her away like a piece of thing he owns.

Sorry to discuss a completely different story than anupama, but, this is an example of evil begets evil. The Pandavas were not helpless, they reaped the price for what they did to Draupadi. Dharma went and gambled the life of his wife away. I don't know how he got called dharmaraya, but let's not agree to the whitewash of mythological characters now :)

If the evil V rises again (or doesn't meet his downfall) they'll have to find new viewers. I don't know anybody who enjoys watching him anymore, no matter how good an actor he is.

Originally posted by: RainFire125

Juhi, u are right in saying that its tough to see negative win in any manner - miniscule, small or big. But if we see our history itself, did not Ravan capture Seetha and keep her in his garden - this was a small win for him, right and this gave reason for Ram to wage war. Similarly, Draupadi was dragged through the Court and was insulted in the worst possible way by the Kauravas. This was a win for them.. Pandavas were helpless and could not do a damn thing... these prove that evil does win at times for the good to shine. If our history only has these, then what can we say when writers resort to the same style of writing a story???

I am not saying that this is the only way!! Ofcourse this is NOT and time and again I have said that simplicity is totally lost now a days and writers do resort to mind games or throwing good people under the bus for a long time and make them suffer to shine evil. I am not for this kind of story telling at all.

So its our choice, we see this through or we stop for some time and resume back when the good has shone above the evil. Take it from me V is far from being down for good. V is also a centric character and he will rise again and fall again till the writers decide to kill his evil or kill him for good.

I agree to this G that you made w.r.t to out mythological history but the point I want to make here is that makers have time and again made V win and let him get away from everything that he does by blaming others or put it on Anupama, Dont you think that its high time that atleast for once he should have his own medicine and let him feel what failure is by making his face smash on the grounds. Bz when Anuj entered the show, every damm viewer wanted him to show V his place and win over V. but makers ne to kuch or hi kar diya.

But V bahut baar jeet chuka hai ab. Its high time to even hit him below the belt. Play the mind games with him too. They have Kavya in this room closest to him who can play with him by joining hands with anuj. But God knows why they are not showing that bloody fight that will be interesting to watch and is not toxic.

Originally posted by: Miniwatch

@bold

This was infact also a case of a man considering his wife as property and pawning her away like a piece of thing he owns.

Sorry to discuss a completely different story than anupama, but, this is an example of evil begets evil. The Pandavas were not helpless, they reaped the price for what they did to Draupadi. Dharma went and gambled the life of his wife away. I don't know how he got called dharmaraya, but let's not agree to the whitewash of mythological characters now :)

If the evil V rises again (or doesn't meet his downfall) they'll have to find new viewers. I don't know anybody who enjoys watching him anymore, no matter how good an actor he is.

V already won today dear. cant you see. 😭

Makers ko sach me new viewer dhondhne honge ab bz we as the viewer are now leaving.

Originally posted by: tintin0602

V already won today dear. cant you see. 😭

Makers ko sach me new viewer dhondhne honge ab bz we as the viewer are now leaving.

Maybe you're right..

I'll give them time till the end of this track to sort it out. If they don't, i guess there's enough content on Netflix to watch anyway :)