An Insult to Ravan

Ravan of Ramayana was a learned scholar a gifted musician and deeply respected by those around him. He was feared by the devastating for his courage. His hamartia washe got carried away by the instigations of his sister. He evoked great respect andadhered to what he perceived as Sharma. He gave Sita her space while relentlessly trying to win her over. To equate Vanraj Shah to his calibre and call him Ravan is an insult to the Lord of Lanka,

Baapuji had mentioned the daily Agni pariksha. Indeed B Band her Ladla and biwi are characters who typify the values that were created to keep women under the control of a tribe of tormentors.the tormentors who wanted the litmus test for others while they deserved it in every way. The audacity they have to point a finger at others without a moments thought of their actions was surely appalling.

A woman that had borne all modes of torture and humiliation in the hands of every Shah is not valued for who she is and her character is sullied because vanraj and his wife had cheated the world for almost a decade. Tomorrow will be a not to miss episode have ordered my popcorn.

I totally agree with u here. This thing crossed my mind too while seeing the precap.

Vanraj shah should not at all be compared with ravan- king of lanka.

It is actually a disgrace to ravan.

Vanraj shah is only technically a man. Otherwise there is no i repeat No single quality of him which can be said is good.

Yes it was an insult because Ravan was very intelligent smart and brave. Just that he stole Sita Mata because of which he ended up dying. I am not glorifying a monster but still.

We cannot compare Ravan and Vanraaj because later is the most stupid, have no sense of what and when to speak, not genuine and many more. Mujhe yaad nahi aa raha hai.

Even if he will be compared to dog, to dog ki insult hogi. I know this is bashing a character but this is what is can think