@Silvermoonlight - it is true across the globe people as young as 16 work as soon as they are able. In Asian countries some kids work at even an younger age. At the same time, it is also true that people at their 20’s don’t work. It goes both way.
Samar wants to pursue a dancing career and if that means that he cannot do a normal job like others, then so be it. He does not need to be reprimanded for this. There are so many careers where people have to do other things than a normal job and that is fine. The same goes for Toshu, if he is studying and taking his exams then working may not be possible. I normally work when time allows but when it comes to studying or taking exams, I would happily leave my job and just focus on my studies.
As for a reply to the original author of this post, Anupamaa as a mother is allowed/entitled to behave however she wants with her children. Whether she needs to discipline her child or not, whether she needs to slap her kids or not, what to say to them or make them do, is all her personal choice. Who are we to say a mother is wrong or dumb to act in a particular way to their child? Every mother decides for themselves what is right for their child. Anupamaa is obviously doing this. Of course, as other people we usually have our own point of view, but this does mean that we are right.
Parents are usually forgiving. In fact, they are often described in comparison to God for their benevolent characteristic. Parents love you even when you hate yourself. Parents love you even when you are wrong (at least a considerable amount of parents).
Also, we cannot disregard that no matter how much socialisation, discipline, morals we are instilled by our parents, all of us at the end of the day are conscious beings. Even if Anupamaa had spent her whole life reprimanding her kids they could have still turned out to be horrible people out in the social world. Even if Anupamaa had slapped Pakhi, she could have still turned out to be selfish!
We must accept ourselves as responsible for our own choices. If we cannot blame other people for the consequences we face from our actions, then surely we cannot blame Anupamaa for the consequences that follow from Pakhi’s actions. Anupamaa clearly faces the consequences (negative) from the way she is with her children, is this not enough that we all feel like that on top of her excruciatingly painful circumstances we must paint in her even worse light?
I want to depart with one thing: no good deed goes unpunished. Even if Anupamaa was to be in the way that you are all expecting her to be, her life could have still been upside. There is no winning in life, just a reasonable compromise.
Best wishes,
The Philosopher
18