Sorry, aren't you contraindicating yourself? You're asking 'why is it always R vs A' but going on to say 'R is bigger culprit'. You are comparing Rohit with Armaan, which is what is bring on the debates. Why do we even need to establish who is at more fault here when such a horrendous mistake and crime has been committed? If everyone is to agree both Rohit and Armaan are equal partners and culprits instead of minimising Armaan's faults, no one would be making it 'R vs A'. Also, why couldn't have Armaan told the truth? Both are culprits and whatever is happening now is the consequence of their actions. Both proved to be terrible husbands who lied to and emotionally manipulated their wives. Best part is both proved to be terrible fathers, who could not dedicate enough time to the baby that lead to the court debacle.
Originally posted by: fangirl1012
Well he wasn’t gleefully enjoying at first. He was very uninvolved with the baby. He also suggested that Ro should tell truth. Also I don’t get why is it always R vs A both are wrong but in my eyes R is bigger culprit because he started the passing parcel game and he was more adamant on keeping up the ruse.
42