Mera Haq, Mera Khoon DT note added Pg 12 - Page 3

Originally posted by: Sukriti4u

I respectfully disagree. Akshara has never exhibited such unreasonable behavior or acted out of rage. She has never torn the child's belongings. When I looked into Manjari's eyes, all I saw was hatred and ego. The truth is, she took the child away from his happy and content home just to satisfy her own ego.

Akshara had arrived to hand over the shoes to Abhir, and as his mother she rightfully questioned the chaos and unrest in the house. Her concerns were focused on Abhir's well-being and peace of mind.

Telling Abhir that he was a financial burden and is responsible for his parents' misery was not unreasonable? Abhir's well being and peace of mind? Really?

Which action had more effect on the child?

I don't defend Manjari because I see her for what she is, similarly I see Akshara for what she is

Originally posted by: Sonali1968

Sorry to differ. Court has given Abhimanyu legal rights to take care of the child not to Manjari. Manjari's involvement comes as a great GrandMOM, no legal connotation. Moreover, Court has not given right her to tear book cover and impose her on Abhir. Legally Akshara can go to court again and court can give an order that Abhimanyu has to live away from Manjari with his son. Akshara never tore book cover of Abhir she did not need to. She will never do that.

If you hate your partner or ex bahu bash her why be rude with a kid. Great Grand Mother can be very nasty with grandchildren Please watch Norway and Mrs Chatterjee based on true story.

@Bold

That's what I said.

What Akshara can do later is not the point, I simply pointed out that Akshara and Abhimanyu's rights over Abhir are not the same because Abhimnayu has sole custody of Abhir and court has stated that a case of fraud will be registered against Akshara for forging Abhir's documents.

She can meet Abhir with Abhimanyu's Permission twice a week

Manjari is not my concern

Originally posted by: Sonali1968

Sorry to differ. Court has given Abhimanyu legal rights to take care of the child not to Manjari. Manjari's involvement comes as a great GrandMOM, no legal connotation. Moreover, Court has not given right her to tear book cover and impose her on Abhir. Legally Akshara can go to court again and court can give an order that Abhimanyu has to live away from Manjari with his son. Akshara never tore book cover of Abhir she did not need to. She will never do that.

If you hate your partner or ex bahu bash her why be rude with a kid. Great Grand Mother can be very nasty with grandchildren Please watch Norway and Mrs Chatterjee based on true story.

Certainly, Akshara has the option to take the matter to court and file a case against Manjari for her reckless behavior, disregarding the child's feelings and efforts. It's unlikely that any child would be happy to learn that their grandmother tore their book cover. It's important for Manjari to respect the child's emotions and provide him with time to adjust to the changes. Expecting him to suddenly change his emotions and completely forget the parents who raised him is unrealistic. Unfortunately, Manjari lacks the patience to wait, and her arrogance and selfishness prevent her from doing so.

Considering Abhir is accustomed to Akshara and Abhinav's gentle parenting and a healthy atmosphere, wonder how he will react if he witnesses his Dida's dramatic behavior.

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Telling Abhir that he was a financial burden and is responsible for his parents' misery was not unreasonable? Abhir's well being and peace of mind? Really?

Which action had more effect on the child?

I don't defend Manjari because I see her for what she is, similarly I see Akshara for what she is

They found themselves compelled to say hurtful words to Abhir, Due to Manjari's impatience and anger. The intention behind this was to ensure that he would leave with Abhimanyu, as by the court orders. Manjari was on the verge of going to the Goenka house to get Abhir if he didn't arrive on time. Once again, she failed to acknowledge the emotions of the child and his parents, who needed time to bid farewell. Although they could still meet on weekends, it would never be the same as before.

Originally posted by: Sukriti4u

Manjari's mind is consumed by rage, hatred, and ego, showing a clear lack of concern for the child's emotional well-being. The sight of her tearing those covers apart was truly horrifying to witness. Mahima spoke the bitter truth, explaining that while Manjari could discard the name slip and cover, she couldn't erase Abhinav and Akshara from Abhir's life, as they are an integral part of him.

Manjari's sole focus was on "Mera Beta Mera Pota Our Haq" (My son, my grandson, and our right), completely disregarding the child's feelings. She questioned why Akshara always appeared at the Birla house, but Akshara rightly reminded her that Abhimanyu used to visit uninvited all the time to see his son. So, why should it be any different for her?

Additionally, it is understandable for Akshara to be concerned about Abhir's well-being in such a chaotic household.

Surekha, was too behaving unreasonably like Manjari, placed blame on the new daughter-in-law for everything that happened.

Originally posted by: Sukriti4u

They found themselves compelled to say hurtful words to Abhir, Due to Manjari's impatience and anger. The intention behind this was to ensure that he would leave with Abhimanyu, as by the court orders. Manjari was on the verge of going to the Goenka house to get Abhir if he didn't arrive on time. Once again, she failed to acknowledge the emotions of the child and his parents, who needed time to bid farewell. Although they could still meet on weekends, it would never be the same as before.

A parent's first concert is well being of a child, you are telling me that responsible parents who care about their son's well being would ever associate a trauma like this to him? Manjari didn't ask them to traumatize Abhir, it was their decision.

They left the most difficult part of the whole ordeal for Abhir, instead of dealing with Abhimnayu and Manjari and standing with Abhir, they decided to let him deal with burden of accepting a new family, losing old family and being responsible for financial condition of his parents.

Did Akshara or Abhinav acknowledge emotional and mental well being of their son?

They had an easy way out of the situation, Abhir was left to do the heavy lifting

Originally posted by: NoraSM

No

Abhimanyu and Akshara don't have the same right because Akshara had kept Abhir away from Abhimanyu illegally

Court has given Abhimnayu legal rights over Abhir and Akshara has visiting rights that too with Abhimanyu's permission

Manjari was doing what Akshara did with Abhimanyu, it is just that Akshara didn't enjoy the mirror

Akshara had kept this truth away from Abhimanyu after 6 years was because she was scared of exactly what's happening today and nothing else.

She just knows how selfish and obsessed that man is, and how toxic is Birla House for anyone. As long as he stayed in his limits, I never saw Akshara objecting any rishta between Abhimanyu and Abhir.

Truth is that Abhimanyu has always been extreme in his ways that a normal person wouldn't be. He KIDNAPPED his own child rather than meeting and wishing him was one example.

And what Manjiri is doing is worst! And inspite of not wanting to support Mahima's dumb agends of uniting Parth-Sehfali, I do agree that Manjiri is totally screwing up life of all children in the toxic environment. Akshara gave all the valid points that she and her family stays in Kasauli, Abhir wants to stay there... That kid keeps begging his stupid parents (AkshNav), but Dr. Birla and his mother is just ignoring his child's pain.

The only stupid thing here is obsession of both Akshu and Manjiri fighting for having Nav and Manyu as fathers name where as none of those two are affected. All both men need at this point is just recognition of being Abhir's father...

Originally posted by: shahsb_26

Akshara had kept this truth away from Abhimanyu after 6 years was because she was scared of exactly what's happening today and nothing else.

She just knows how selfish and obsessed that man is, and how toxic is Birla House for anyone. As long as he stayed in his limits, I never saw Akshara objecting any rishta between Abhimanyu and Abhir.

Truth is that Abhimanyu has always been extreme in his ways that a normal person wouldn't be. He KIDNAPPED his own child rather than meeting and wishing him was one example.

And what Manjiri is doing is worst! And inspite of not wanting to support Mahima's dumb agends of uniting Parth-Sehfali, I do agree that Manjiri is totally screwing up life of all children in the toxic environment. Akshara gave all the valid points that she and her family stays in Kasauli, Abhir wants to stay there... That kid keeps begging his stupid parents (AkshNav), but Dr. Birla and his mother is just ignoring his child's pain.

The only stupid thing here is obsession of both Akshu and Manjiri fighting for having Nav and Manyu as fathers name where as none of those two are affected. All both men need at this point is just recognition of being Abhir's father...

@Bold

I watch episodes of YRKKH on Hotstar, I am not familiar with the show you are talking about.

Thanks

I want Mahima’s words to come true and this paagal aurat needs to stay alone ,she don’t deserve to stay with anyone except her ladla! Kaunsa Haq? How will a grandmother have more rights than a mother? Court haven’t given verdict in her favour ,it’s AbM who won the case on the basis of money! The kid is with her in her house ,she doesn’t care abt his happiness or his mental health all she cares is Haq n Khoon n her son’s happiness !

In this world a mother will have more haq than anyone! That the fact and no one or no court can change that fact!

Originally posted by: Sukriti4u

They found themselves compelled to say hurtful words to Abhir, Due to Manjari's impatience and anger. The intention behind this was to ensure that he would leave with Abhimanyu, as by the court orders. Manjari was on the verge of going to the Goenka house to get Abhir if he didn't arrive on time. Once again, she failed to acknowledge the emotions of the child and his parents, who needed time to bid farewell. Although they could still meet on weekends, it would never be the same as before.