Since the day of shootout, those who r saying, "Adi was not a saint, ishita did what she did was to save a girl's life, wouldn't Raman do the same if it was ruhi in roshni's place bla bla bla".
Put urself in the shoes of ishita n answer me, Ur son is harming a girl's life, he is totally wrong, would u dare to shoot him dead? Either of the two lives are at stake, would u choose to save Ur son's or some other random person's life? Even if u know Ur son will lead a miserable life in the jail or as a paralysed person if u shot him in arm or leg, would u dare to rather shoot him dead than letting him be alive n then treating him physically n mentally? Do u have those guts even if ur son is the worst of the worst person alive on the earth? R u the tulsi or ishita of real world to think like that?
Ishita is a jagatmata as a character, so she did that. But is Raman, as a character, too a jagatpita? No, he isn't. He is as normal human as us all for whom his family matters the most the way it is. So it's very understandable if he would do the same if it was ruhi in place of roshni, but didn't want ishita to do so with Adi. Shooting a stranger for Ur kid is humane, shooting Ur kid for a stranger is not.
Adding to that, it was only a day before that Raman had learnt what Adi has turned into, so he can not hate Adi to an extent that he wouldn't mind his son getting killed, that too in the hands of his wife. Just because he didn't want him dead doesn't mean he supported his deeds, all he wanted was to punish him legally n then bring him on the right path as a father...which is the most realistic thing.
When u judge Raman, think like a normal person that u r, not as an ideal person...because Raman isn't an idealist unlike ishita, he has always been a flawed yet very real character when it comes to his priorities.
Edited by IFLove - 7 years ago