MIHIIKA is a Two-Faced

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

07sid01

@07sid01

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: brihati

In 1 of the episode mihika told romi to stay away from ashok
But romi said I will handle him and get sidelined ashok...

But why did he go to ashok in the first place, why didn't he work hard and start from the bottom to raise to the top to show raman that he is better. All he did by going to ashok to help him is show that even he himslef feels that he cannot do business without corrupt activities. He should of started off without ashoks help, that would have been better to show raman. And why didn't mihika or the iyers stop him right at the beginning from joining hands with ashok, telling him that 7 years later isn't going to make a difference. The fact that they knew an let him carry on is what bothers me.If they can stay mad at raman for apparently "killing" ishita can't they stay mad at romi for going to the person who almost cause mihika to die and commit suicide. It just shows that they are two faced.

Edited by 07sid01 - 9 years ago

Quote

Jayshree

@Cinderella100

Voyager

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#12

No wonder Shagun gets so much screen space. Members in this forum will rather hate the leads/paralell leads than the vamp. by the way Mihika was right she had more right in that house as she is Romi's wife. God knows what Shagun's role in Bhalla house is.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

07sid01

@07sid01

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: Cinderella100
No wonder Shagun gets so much screen space. Members in this forum will rather hate the leads/paralell leads than the vamp. by the way Mihika was right she had more right in that house as she is Romi's wife. God knows what Shagun's role in Bhalla house is.

Oh please! Shagun there or not there makes no difference to me personally, its like she doessntexist. But what right does mihika have on that house when up until she found out ishita was alive she wanted nothing to do with the bhalla family and she never encouraged romi to patch up with his parents who did nothing wrong to him. If i remember before ishita came back mihika kept giving ballahs dirty looks and wanted nothing to do with them. She can't go back to pretending as if nothing happened and like she didn't break ties with the bhallas

Quote

GBSC

@GBSC

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#14

Mihika is doing what ishu ought to be doing.

Quote

07sid01

@07sid01

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: GBSC
Mihika is doing what ishu ought to be doing.

What? Ignoring the bhallas for seven years and then all of a sudden when ishita comes switches to being okay with the bhallas again? She didn't even invite them to their own sons wedding.

Quote

GBSC

@GBSC

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: 07sid01

What? Ignoring the bhallas for seven years and then all of a sudden when ishita comes switches to being okay with the bhallas again? She didn't even invite them to their own sons wedding.

How will she when as an Iyer her whole family was avoided by the ballas?

But once the ballas did come for her wedding,Mihika did receive them.

This is how reality works.

Forgive n forget.

Quote

07sid01

@07sid01

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: GBSC

How will she when as an Iyer her whole family was avoided by the ballas?
But once the ballas did come for her wedding,Mihika did receive them.
This is how reality works.
Forgive n forget.

More like she accused raman of killing ishita and encouraged romi in going against his family and the iyers mad at the bhallas but not mad at the fact that romi joined hands with the man who drove mihika to suicide.

About bhallas going to the wedding, mihika didn't even bother inviting them, they found out from adi and the reason she accepted them was because by that time she found out ishita was alive and she thinking that those seven years of her hostility toward the bhallas are non-existent.

Quote

GBSC

@GBSC

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: 07sid01

More like she accused raman of killing ishita and encouraged romi in going against his family and the iyers mad at the bhallas but not mad at the fact that romi joined hands with the man who drove mihika to suicide.

About bhallas going to the wedding, mihika didn't even bother inviting them, they found out from adi and the reason she accepted them was because by that time she found out ishita was alive and she thinking that those seven years of her hostility toward the bhallas are non-existent.

The fact is ,the ballas were the ones who attended the wedding w/o being invited

Did Mihika send them away like Ashok tried to at Ruhi's b'day party?

This is the difference.

Quote

Priya

@priyadarshini.r

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: Cinderella100
No wonder Shagun gets so much screen space. Members in this forum will rather hate the leads/paralell leads than the vamp. by the way Mihika was right she had more right in that house as she is Romi's wife. God knows what Shagun's role in Bhalla house is.

The TM has opened a generic thread about Mihika, by taking my POV with respect to Mihika demanding an apology from Raman to Romi and getting involved in that unnecessary senseless drama with Ishita by forcing an apology. The TM should have been careful in detailing the context there.

My POV has nothing to do with Mihika showing shagun her place in the house in yesterday's episode. She was correct. For me Shagun never exists at all, despite all her antics and despite the CV's repeated attempt to thrust her down my throat in every other scene. She is completely non-existent creature for me. Period.

Cheers

Priya