Originally posted by: --Megha--
Ya absolutely in platonic relationship u cant lead on n give false hopes to other party n then reject right when theystart getting intimate. 😳 thats y talking in a relationship is important.
N here as we saw Ishita said No to babies but not to intimacy so we cant assume that Ishita is not OK with intimacy - so this was my point.
Besides we have seen her getting excited or even blushing when Bala told her about first step or she back hugged Raman n wasalmost about to kiss him but Raman was talking with his client over video call so she back tracked. Intehan hogai intezaar ki - she danced for Raman but Adi took overdose n cosummation disturbed. There r so many examples like that.
Basically CVs r only showing that every time this couple comes closer to intimacy they r disturbed by something else n they cant take it further.
Agreed
I was thinking, that maybe, this is being stretched for more practical reasons related to the 7@30 audience. See, it is known that viewers do lose interest (and even story starts losing steam) after the leads get intimate. Once the timeslot changed, they had to show this as a new story to engage the audience for some time. Because showing anything sooner may have led to loss of viewership sooner too. For them the show has been on air less than 6 months na?