Really surprised that Raman's lawyer hasn't actually explained this scenario to him, that in case if Adi actually is proven guilty it reflects poorly on Shagun as a parent and since he's just 12 years and still a minor, the court can actually decide that she is an unfit parent incapable of handling her child.
As a result, Raman can actually get the custody of both his children who mean the entire world to him. If not Raman, I hope atleast Ishita's lawyer has the brains to take advantage of the situation. Since even after being proven guilty Adi is still a minor and won't be given major punishment and most likely then Ishita and Madhvi will revoke the accident case. But the major issue here is that Shagun needs to be removed as the legal custodian of the boy since she's only doing him harm here as a mother, The bhalla household will most definitely be a better home for Adi.
Really hope the creatives handle this wisely as it can lead to a goldmine of a story with Raman-Ishita getting sole custody and Shagun left empty handed with No Ashok to hold on to either...
Does anyone else think this make sense?