Why then was Shagun shown to be so clueless with regard to parenting Ruhi when she was with her. Shagun was shown to be more interested in spas and massages, being with Ashok, or going to outings rather than getting to know Ruhi. When she had no option but to be with Ruhi, Shagun was shown to be disinterested in her, preferring to leave the child with the nanny rather than trying to get to know her. At no time did we see Shagun showing any affection for Ruhi. For Shagun, Ruhi was a sort of a "problem child" for which she had to heavily rely on Ishita's help --a move that cost her dearly as she ended up losing Ruhi to Ishita.
Granted Ruhi did not know Shagun at all and was deeply unhappy at being displaced from her home. Whether or not Shagun could have won little Ruhi over with love is a moot point now, but the fact remains that she did not even try. Shagun appeared to be incapable of expressing love towards her daughter. Had her demeanor been the same with Aditya, I would have thought that Shagun was one of those women who consider children as an embellishment to them. It is not that they do not love their children, but they are way more interested in themselves than in anyone else. However, we find that Shagun connects to Aditya with an ease that she could never commandeer for Ruhi.
The question is why is this so? Is it the classic Freudian explanation of the Oedipal complex that makes it easier for fathers to relate to their daughters and mothers to their sons? Or was Shagun incapable of loving Ruhi because Ruhi reminded her of herself --strangely helpless, displaced, and victimized, a pawn of Ashok's games?
Thoughts and comments welcome