I would Love to Hear from Damini....DT note pg63 - Page 30

Originally posted by: lamboobabu

can anybody educate me
which of the bollywood greats
did nautanki in their ex's house
to fight for their luv...
ram hi rakhe...mujhe toh yaad nahin aata
pata nahin akash ko sapne mein
ayee hogi...that is why he has
adopted those ideals in doing those
disgustful acts...
lage raho...the more you do ... the more you will be hated
for your so called love...loving it...

And here somebody is busy justifying EXTRA-MARITAL AFFAIR to defend his point. 🤣 Haal bura hai, bahut bura. Yes, doing nautanki is a 100000 times worse than having affairs while married. 🤣
Another classic post after "Raj Kapoor was a great family man". 🤣 🤣 These Bollywood men cheated on their wives ALL their lives and yet you're saluting them for "great family values". So Vishnu should just have had an Extra-Marital-Affair with Mukta. That would have been acceptable rather than divorce to our sanskaar warrior, right? Yeh sab kya hai. KYA HAI? 🤔


Lambooji, I already gave you the advice to stop ridiculing yourself in open forum. Better take it. You've lost the argument. You don't know what to say.


@Princessofkesar: Khisyani billi khamba noche to suni thi, par yeh dekh pehli baar rahi hoon. 🤣 Doing nautanki is worse than having affair. OMG! Nobody can beat that one. 🤣
Apne hi argument ke jaal mein buri tarah faas jaane se yahin hota hai. Tch tch.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

father of girl after commitment has this power ???????? Which court in the world gives father of girl the power to do this level of interference ? Do u know what the courts would say to RPR if Meethi made case on Akash for bulldozing purposefully in the house and it came out that RPR had financed him ? RPR would not be behind bars but pulled up sharply by court .

Father of girl who is ditched has at the most THIS right and that too its not legal or binding but understandable from a human angle

asking the guy privately why he did what he did , ranting righteously and then telling the girl firmly to forget the guy and MOVE ON

bas . Only THIS much right he has . He has NO right to stay behind the scenes like a Mafia Don and break marraige of that guy .

i have heard about the rights of a ditched girl's father a lot in this forum and these r the rights of a ditched girl's father .

That too is not hard and fast and binding on the guy . He can tell the girl's father to go to hell if he wants to and the father can do nothing about it .

My point is he can only rant and rave .

About the compatibility factor , i know what u all feel and i am not here to change ur thoughts but gave mine . They r not compatible from any angle period as for me just looks don't count .

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

And here somebody is busy justifying EXTRA-MARITAL AFFAIR to defend his point. 🤣 Haal bura hai, bahut bura. Yes, doing nautanki is a 100000 times worse than having affairs while married. 🤣
Another classic post after "Raj Kapoor was a great family man". 🤣 🤣 These Bollywood men cheated on their wives ALL their lives and yet you're saluting them for "great family values". So Vishnu should just have had an Extra-Marital-Affair with Mukta. That would have been acceptable rather than divorce to our sanskaar warrior, right? Yeh sab kya hai. KYA HAI? 🤔


Lambooji, I already gave you the advice to stop ridiculing yourself in open forum. Better take it. You've lost the argument. You don't know what to say.


@Princessofkesar: Khisyani billi khamba noche to suni thi, par yeh dekh pehli baar rahi hoon. 🤣 Doing nautanki is worse than having affair. OMG! Nobody can beat that one. 🤣
Apne hi argument ke jaal mein buri tarah faas jaane se yahin hota hai. Tch tch.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

father of girl after commitment has this power ???????? Which court in the world gives father of girl the power to do this level of interference ? Do u know what the courts would say to RPR if Meethi made case on Akash for bulldozing purposefully in the house and it came out that RPR had financed him ? RPR would not be behind bars but pulled up sharply by court .

Father of girl who is ditched has at the most THIS right and that too its not legal or binding but understandable from a human angle

asking the guy privately why he did what he did , ranting righteously and then telling the girl firmly to forget the guy and MOVE ON

bas . Only THIS much right he has . He has NO right to stay behind the scenes like a Mafia Don and break marraige of that guy .

i have heard about the rights of a ditched girl's father a lot in this forum and these r the rights of a ditched girl's father .

That too is not hard and fast and binding on the guy . He can tell the girl's father to go to hell if he wants to and the father can do nothing about it .

My point is he can only rant and rave .

About the compatibility factor , i know what u all feel and i am not here to change ur thoughts but gave mine . They r not compatible from any angle period as for me just looks don't count .

kools bang on post.

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

Tiny: Well, if Vishnu can't be allowed to stop the marriage even after viewing Meethi's face, then he got married without consent or by force. Why then, should he be expected to make it work? Isn't that unfairly trapping somebody against his wishes? And in today's day, no woman gets a bad name forever if the marriage breaks even at the altar. Vishnu, in my opinion, should've stopped and saved Meethi from an unhappy future.

bcoz gal was not @ fault. and mainly i think its his wish 2work on it. i m not saying any prsn who got in such situtn has 2 work on it. but vishnu himself wanted 2 work on it.

But the fact is mukta-vishnu r going to b together and meethi-aakash r going to unite soon.why do u guys want to discuss endlessly what could haver been with meethi-vishnu,they r over u all have to accept it. In this forum unlike other shows nothing is discussed what is happening in the show just discussing nonsense stuff.i just see this forum look at topics and go to other interesting forums.

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

And here somebody is busy justifying EXTRA-MARITAL AFFAIR to defend his point. 🤣 Haal bura hai, bahut bura. Yes, doing nautanki is a 100000 times worse than having affairs while married. 🤣
Another classic post after "Raj Kapoor was a great family man". 🤣 🤣 These Bollywood men cheated on their wives ALL their lives and yet you're saluting them for "great family values". So Vishnu should just have had an Extra-Marital-Affair with Mukta. That would have been acceptable rather than divorce to our sanskaar warrior, right? Yeh sab kya hai. KYA HAI? 🤔


Lambooji, I already gave you the advice to stop ridiculing yourself in open forum. Better take it. You've lost the argument. You don't know what to say.


@Princessofkesar: Khisyani billi khamba noche to suni thi, par yeh dekh pehli baar rahi hoon. 🤣 Doing nautanki is worse than having affair. OMG! Nobody can beat that one. 🤣
Apne hi argument ke jaal mein buri tarah faas jaane se yahin hota hai. Tch tch.

if you have asked me you have to take it
anyway I am not infatuated by that criminals
but I am infatuated by the great
persons who respected their marriage and family
rather than their love - premarital or extra marital
they realised unlike your role models
akash-mukta...
aap ko mubarak ho aap ki role model
I am proud of my role models...
baki toh Ram hi Rakhe...

le ke kuttaran ki naam
le lo labmoojee ki gyaan.
liye toh thik, jiban sudhar jayegi.
barna akash-mukta ki nayee gyan to hai hi...
jo pata nahin...kya kya banadegi...
baki toh Ram hi Rakhe...

he can drag him to the court,i heard of such cases but i m not aware oder aspects of such cases.

this kuttaran is too stupid a show
for deserving comparison even remotely to
real life situation, especially
the lightening speed of its
marriage and divorce...
its marriage and divorce rules and logic
is a good laughter dose...
just lay back and enjoy this comic show...