Muku meri beti...

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

queen_of_hearts

@queen_of_hearts

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

#11

but is not tapasya step mother of yuvi??.bcoz she was first wife of veer.so from this reason yuvi & mukta are step bro-sis...😆 why cvs cant understand this...🤢

Edited by sahera - 13 years ago

Quote

Twinkie_Star

@Twinkie_Star

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: sahera
but is not tapasya step mother of yuvi??.bcoz she was first wife of veer.so from this reason yuvi & mukta are step bro-sis...😆 why cvs cant understand this...🤢

Step bro-sis means father or mother will be common for both kids...here yuvi and muktha are not having common father or mother...I don't know how cv's are going to handle it...

CVS are making fun of all relations...they made iccha-tappu as sisters and both married to veer, and also cvs made iccha to marry both brothers-veer and vanch...

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Mario

@palma0211

Navigator

Posted: 13 years ago

#13

if u tie a rakhi band you have become brother and sister so later if u want to be romanticially involved whole society thinks ur nuts...this has happened in my family...

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#14

if u tie a rakhi band you have become brother and sister so later if u want to be romanticially involved whole society thinks ur nuts...this has happened in my family... [/QUOTEbut mukta never tied rakhi 2 yuvi as he was stolen immediately after the birth & always at rathore's home & taps never even picke dup mukta leave alone let her tie a rakhi 2 yuvi!!

so in any sense its not weired if they go 4 Yukta!!

but i wish CVs end this pathetic show ASAP!!🤢🤢

Quote

queen_of_hearts

@queen_of_hearts

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: lemna_02
Step bro-sis means father or mother will be common for both kids...here yuvi and muktha are not having common father or mother...I don't know how cv's are going to handle it...
CVS are making fun of all relations...they made iccha-tappu as sisters and both married to veer, and also cvs made iccha to marry both brothers-veer and vanch...

yes you are right,i was confused thats why i asked.i already know this.ppl are creating so much misconceptions🤢yukta can happen if they are adopted by eachother's parents.because there is no blood realtionship..😳

Quote

-bonbon-

@-bonbon-

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

#16

In saying that Mukta is Tapasya's daughter not Ichcha's...this is basically saying that an adopted child is not like a daughter or son! Seriously-blood relation is not everything! Are people trying to say that an adopted child like Mukta should not have the right to be called the daughter of Ichcha, just because she is adopted and is not blood related to her parents (Veecha)! Mr Rathore and Tapasya legally adopted Yuvraj and Ichcha and Veer legally adopted Mukta. This makes the following true:

1. Mr Rathore and Tapasya are the biological parents of Mukta

2. Mr Rathore and Tapasya are the parents of Yuvraj since he was legally adopted by them

3. Veecha are the biological parents of Yuvi

3. Veecha are the parents of Mukta since she was legally adopted by them

There fore Yuvi and Mukta are siblings! Not necessarily blood related, but they are brother and sister!

Coming to the point that Ichcha should not have called Mukku her daughter...what is wrong in her doing so?! What is wrong in giving a child with missing parents the love of a mother! In fact, I love Ichcha for accepting Mukta as her daughter! That was so sweet of her! Please guys stop finding the negatives in everything and fine the love hidden between Ichcha, Meethi and Mukta of mother-daughter and sisters respectively.

I am not trying to disappoint anyone's expectations! It is not anyone's fault for thinking that Yukta make a romantic pair, in fact I believe that it is the CVs fault for not clearing the misconceptions! If they want Yukta to be paired they have to promote the fact (somehow or the other) that Mukta is not Veecha's daughter and Yuvi is not Mr Rathore and Tapasya's daughter. Leave it up to the CVs guys! Don't worry too much! :) x

Edited by Preeti_Shadia - 13 years ago

Quote

newvee

@newvee

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: lemna_02
Step bro-sis means father or mother will be common for both kids...here yuvi and muktha are not having common father or mother...I don't know how cv's are going to handle it...
CVS are making fun of all relations...they made iccha-tappu as sisters and both married to veer, and also cvs made iccha to marry both brothers-veer and vanch...

Step brother n sis dont have common father or mother. In that case yuvi will be called half bro n not step bro. Hence yuvi is muktas step bro only at least as per the definition of that word. And never heard of any step bro n sis getting married.

Edited by Newveechafan - 13 years ago

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: Newveechafan
Step brother n sis dont have common father or mother. In that case yuvi will be called half bro n not step bro. Hence yuvi is muktas step bro only at least as per the definition of that word. And never heard of any step bro n sis getting married.

sumtimes DIL/SIL r also called as beti/beta so it doesn't mean DIL has bcum sis of her husband or vice-versa!!

yuvi & mukta r neither siblings nor half bro-sis nor they r rakhi bro-sis. so there shud not b any prob 4 their pairing if CVs want!!

i don't know why ppl r averse 4 this pairing just on this basis & making it luk like sumthing against moral values. this reminds of the famous "devar-bhabhi" jaap of this froum!!these excuses r given bcoz ppl don't like pairing as per their liking.if any1 don't like any pair then its ok.ppl can've difft choices but just making oder's POV luk like immoral is not gud!!bcoz every region/religion/community has difft moral values!!!

Quote

newvee

@newvee

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#19

@tiny i never said that anything against others preference. What i said is as per the definition of the word step brother yuvi is step brother to mukta which nobody can deny. Dont want to comment abt devar-bhabhi jhaap now. Ofcourse different religions/communities have different customs. I've heard of devar bhabhi weddings, cousins wedding even in some parts of india a girl is m,arried to her maternal uncle(quite disgusting though it may be right according to their community) But never ever heard of step bro n sis getting married in real life. If it is possibl in any society or religion ,please inform .I am also curious to know.

Edited by Newveechafan - 13 years ago

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: Newveechafan
@tiny i never said that anything against others preference. What i said is as per the definition of the word step brother yuvi is step brother to mukta which nobody can deny. Dont want to comment abt devar-bhabhi jhaap now. Ofcourse different religions/communities have different customs. I've heard of devar bhabhi weddings, cousins wedding even in some parts of india a girl is m,arried to her maternal uncle(quite disgusting though it may be right according to their community) But never ever heard of step bro n sis getting married in real life. If it is possibl in any society or religion ,please inform .I am also curious to know.

i m not saying abt u. i was making a general post after seeing many ppl opposing just on this basis!!

and facts r stranger than fiction. and in real life i'd read many such cases in newspapers etc.

and they r not even can b called as step bro-sis as taps was married 2 veer long ago & mukta & yuvi never ever've any such connections 4 a long time like from childhood 2 adulthood or even in childhood they were never remain under the same roof 4 a long time 2 develpo bro-sis relationship.

and abt marriage wid maternal uncle then its a tradition based on that times condns or situtns!!!so we can't say it disgsuting.i'd read history during my UPSC exam preprns & also've interest in it. so on this basis & even acc. 2 our religious(hindu) scriptures theres notthing wrong eitehr in yukta pairing nor "devar-bhabhp" marriage if they r not cheating while married 2 oder like sum sort of illegitimate relation!!😊😊

Quote

1 2 3

Muku meri beti... - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics