Muku meri beti... - Page 3

Palma i want 2 know, the aim of ur post was it to say that iccha is wrong by calling mukku as daughter or to say that whether yukta is wrong coz iccha calls her beti?
In both case, i dissagree wid u!
Iccha was guardian and LIKE a mother to mukku ,4 1yr. She can call her beti although she is not her biological mom and no longer legal parent.
Regarding yukta- i have already put my view on various theories which want to prove yukta as bro sis in my thread (where i have asked 4 yukta at on behalf of yukta fans.)
But in ur thread 2 theories are discussed 1 iccha calling mukku beti
2 step bro sis theory
i would like share my pov here.
You are saying Iccha calls mukku beti so she becomes yuvi's sis
then according to national oath , i cant marry indian right?
And in sgp , suhana is cousin of ishan as suhana and badi ma have daughter-mother relation !is it rite?
And as all SIL are beta, so in india husband wife can be called as a bro sis! Yes?
If 4 all above questions ur ans is positive then yukta are bro n sis!
2nd theory of step sibling
before i go into detail i want to know whether you accept the fact that yukta are not biologicaly related and they are not half sibling(as they are not related by blood), neither rakhi bro sis.
Now i cant call yukta step siblings as they were born after the tapsveer marriage was dissolved and they were never raised as sibling in 1 family.
2nd reason is that i don't accept a cheated force marriage were veer gave saat vachan thinking his bride as iccha, never had emotional or physical bonding to taps as a wife.
I want to ask u same question which i have asked in previous thread.
If mukku remained bundela and uv wid rathore and after many years later they meet , fall in love and get married( going against family if required). And after their marriage their secrete of biological parent is revealed then
do you think it is ethical to label this husband wife as bro sis?If yes
then tell me who is morally more wrong as a couple the yukta who were never raised as sibling and not aware of their past and who are not biologically related
or tapveer as groom was cheated by marrying wrong wife, and they never had husband wife relation in any sense and taps infact had physical relation wid rathore wen she had not taken a divorce.
There are marriages in past and in present among common people between step siblings which are not cnsidered illegal ( and i dont approve them if their raised in 1 house or if their parent shared as husband wife relation in true sense)
i will give eg from history as it breaks both rule set by you.
Nur jahan was 29th wife of jahangir aka salim, and he was her 2nd husband.
Jahangirs step mom gave nur jahan the position of her daughter since she was childless, so idealy speaking this two become brosis according to your first theory.
But their marriage was accepted by society of dat time.
After her marriage, to keep her step son khurram in her controll she married her daughter ladli begum born from 1st husband to khurram wid out any objection from religious and social community(though i found it ackward)
but my point is, that there are marriages between step siblings which are accepted in many communities and compared to them yukta should be much more acceptible as i dont think they are step siblings for reasons mentioned above.
Haan apart from this theory if you feel there are other theories(eg adoption theory,cousin theory milk theory) . You can present as i have already have answer to them.
I have to do just copy paste.
Any other reason to oppose yukta? I will like to know!
I m saurab n sreejita fan and love their chemistry!
Ok i have to go 2 sleep now gud nite palma!

princess thank u so much for ur info abt nurjahan n jahangirs kids. Really didnt know that marriage between step sibling were accepted by society. But what I said was it will be disgusting for me and i cannot accept that. And abt veer not claiming multas custody. Ofcourse he told abt it but it was iccha who stopped him coz jogi n divya had noone in their life. It didnt meen that veer never liked mukta as his daughter. And the scenario where yuvi n mukta brought up with their adoptted parents n after 20 yrs falling for each otherr. OK then think of another scenario where yuvi stays with rathore n after 20 yrs falling in love with meethi( dont kill me. but it is also possible no)we cannot prevent such situations even in real life too. Cannot agree more abt our national anthem. In fact it had confused me a lot in my childhood. I used to think if all indians r bros n sis how can i marry my brother. And i used to tell my self that all indians r my bros n sis except one person. Well cannot comment on sgp since i have rately watched it. But of course i would have called suhana ishans cousin had badima adopted ishaan at least for some time. My view abt yukta is quite simple. If my parents had adopted a boy before my birth n loved him as their own son n later he was taken back his biological parents, I would have still considered him as a brother even if we had not grown up together n that equation would not change to something else.

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

That was disgusting though🤢 She is not Ichha's daughter she is Tapu's daughter! Ichha shouldn't have said that!

Why Iccha shouldn's say that... Iccha was raising her as her own daughter... REMEMBER???? Just because she is not Iccha's blood... she cant be called her beti???? Iccha was a very good mother to Mukta!!!!

Originally posted by: Newveechafan

princess thank u so much for ur info abt nurjahan n jahangirs kids. Really didnt know that marriage between step sibling were accepted by society. But what I said was it will be disgusting for me and i cannot accept that[and even i said that i don't approve them and yuktas situation is 100 times better as i dont think they are half sibling for reason mentioned in my previous post of this topic.may be you approve tapsveer wedding. it is your pov]

And abt veer not claiming multas custody. Ofcourse he told abt it but it was iccha who stopped him coz jogi n divya had noone in their life. It didnt meen that veer never liked mukta as his daughter.[ i never said veer did not consider mukta as daughter, he did but only out of respect and love to his wife. if given a chance where he had to pick between mukku and yuvi atleast he would choose his own blood cant say same thing about iccha[ you are regular viewer remember veecha fight over kanha and yuvi veer loved kanha but never PREFERRED over yuvi]. and if iccha had supported and put the idea of giving mukuta to jogi, then it is more in favour of yukta.a mukta was given willingly by veecha]

And the scenario where yuvi n mukta brought up with their adoptted parents n after 20 yrs falling for each otherr[ so what is your ans? do you approve it ? what you think the society /law/religion will have problem wid that union?]

. OK then think of another scenario where yuvi stays with rathore n after 20 yrs falling in love with meethi( dont kill me. but it is also possible no)we cannot prevent such situations even in real life too.

it is a genuine question and i m not killer { atleast i won't kill any1 for this question 😆]. there is possiblity of arising such situation and such things are happened!

but question is whether i will approve it? more imp than that is- whether meethi and yuvi will continue this relation? our indian society,their religious belief and law approve it? answer is big no

i don't approve as i m against incest [ opinion developed based on my upbringing, social values, religious belief and practiced followed in my community which plays a role for my opinion -saying this cause some people you will find for sure who will not mind incest based ontheir culture and religion}

yuvi and meethi will they continue?- no first of all i will feel bad for both, as both are in deli ma they are in guilt of marrying sibling by [even if it is by mistake] and will have difficulty to accept the fact that a person who was husband or wife few days back and now has become sibling. most proably they will dissolve their relation like a this couple in my eg did. i had read in news about this couple [theyare actually unidentical twins separated in childhood due to divorce of parents,and therefore never remembered other sibling and parent. realised only after thier wedding. ] unless yuvi and meethi are like despo couple like 1 in germany who continued even after punishment for incest and have 3 kids]

Hinduism does not approve, incest. Vedas mention instances where incest was punished and Brahman community follow a gotra system where peolpe belonging to one lineages cannot marry each other.

according to Hindu marriage act of 1955, this wedding is illegal.

[ as far as yukta situation- no probs 4rm me and law and society - if u want to me to elaborate on it, i can]

Cannot agree more abt our national anthem. In fact it had confused me a lot in my childhood. I used to think if all indians r bros n sis how can i marry my brother. And i used to tell my self that all indians r my bros n sis except one person.[ what about crushes and ex-love, and people wid remarriage or widow remarriage 😉 ] lucky you to find true love in 1st attempt

Well cannot comment on sgp since i have rately watched it. But of course i would have called suhana ishans cousin had badima adopted ishaan at least for some time.

i m not regular viewer , but loved mil-dil chemistry over there, and badima doesnot even have to adopt ishaan , as according to you'll -mathmatical adoption theory makes ishaan-suhana as paternal cousin. My view abt yukta is quite simple. If my parents had adopted a boy before my birth n loved him as their own son n later he was taken back his biological parents, I would have still considered him as a brother even if we had not grown up together n that equation would not change to something

else

no1 will say you are wrong by calling that guy as a bro even if ur not raised together since you are made aware of the fact by your parent that you had a adopted bro who is no longer in their custody.
Some other person will not consider him as bro( does not mean that this persn should have fallen in luv wid that guy).
Ok i m putting you in same awkward situation i mentioned early, tell me what steps u will take in dat condition !
Suppose your parent dont tell you about history of adopting guy [ say he was wid your parents 4 3 months before your birth], they loved him like their own son but since he was parted away [ consider any reason] , they never told u about him as his memory always brought tears to them.[ so very strong attachment to that guy]
Now after some years you meet your mr perfect and get married to him and even have kids.
Only to realise 1day that this guy was actualy adopted for while by your parent !
Will you apply same logic?

I feel , person's reaction to situation will depend upon type of situation and many other thing( i don't want to retype them)
giving you eg of different situation
if a (girl) n b(boy) are neighbour
then 1 person [a] can consider him as bro/ frn/lover

depending on various aspect and most importantly depend upon what they feel 4 each other and kind of emotional bond they have..

.edited previous post,and added point on post above.

Originally posted by: paapoo.2012

discuss this point

open a new topic and leave topics in themselves alone...if we all mix everything all the time who will understand what????more clarity pls..also in language as a lot are writing in such a style that i don't get anything..so how can I answer...simple sentences,simple lines and all will be understood!!!😉😊