Tapasya removes all traces of marriage(ModNotepg10) - Page 6

Originally posted by: mesmerised

@ srkluvr:did u just re-define feminism just 2 justify what tapasya is doing..seriously now dat u started on feminism..lemme jst tel evrybody d basic underlying principle in feminism in EQUALITY..women want 2 b treated and respected as equals and not subordinates..its about raising voice against oppression.. and nowhere has anyone seen tapasya being the oppressed one..am not pro-iccha but one shud atleast have the wisdom 2 see what is right and what is wrong..😳

fine i agree wid u tapasya felt neglected by her dad wen iccha was around but what she has done is not justified..ATLEAST PROVOKING SUM1 TO DIE iS NOT !! just coz she didnot pull d trigger does not make her less of a WRONG-DOER!!🤔

if as u say tapasya is a feminist and doesnot need a man to live..den y did she marry veer in d first place..she cud hv done well on her own..she was a rich man's daughter and she cud hv created a great empire for herself instead of lying and cheating..if she was such a feminist y did she try 2 seduce veer..or feminists have no self respect??😲😲and isnt she planning on a revenge already..even if she has a baby y go back 2 d people who mistreated her..y use d baby as a plank 2 get back at dem? her marriage wid veer was a sham..veer didnt know who was he taking d pheras wid..she didnot uphold d sacred institution of marriage ..ever!!

again i agree wid u dat veer duped her..but can u deny she has been doing dat for ages now..just coz she got a taste of her own medicine and found it 2 b bitter..dat doesnt make lying and cheating wrong..dese have always been considered as vices..it just means i keep slapping my neighbour daily for years and once he/she hits back..i startup a non violence ka dharna..😆😆 or shud i say ita a case of pot calling the kettle black !! even i like d way rashmi has potrayed d character but dat does not give me d jurisdiction 2 call her a righteous person !!

people have been using feminism for their own convenience..women want 2 equals but still dey curse men sitting on the WOMEN ONLY reserved seats..dont narrow down d concept wich was a revolution in itself just so dat u can justify 1 person's deeds..

p.s. every1 has a right 2 hold opinions ..i respect urs..u like tapasya..dis reply is just to answer d conflict in d concept of feminism !!

r v stil talking about it??😲😲😲

Originally posted by: mesmerised

thanx anweha and cj !!😊

i simly replied against using an universal revolution and twisting it for justifying sumthng lk dis..feminism is too huge a concept to reason tapasya's behaviour !!

Originally posted by: anu rulz

i personally dnt think there is any reason to reason taps behavior bt am a mere mortal who has sum set ideas abt evil..😆..yahan to pata nahi kabhi law kabhi psychology kabhi feminism kabhi kuch kabhi kuch chalta hai..very confusing scenario..

Originally posted by: anu rulz

i personally dnt think there is any reason to reason taps behavior bt am a mere mortal who has sum set ideas abt evil..😆..yahan to pata nahi kabhi law kabhi psychology kabhi feminism kabhi kuch kabhi kuch chalta hai..very confusing scenario..

Originally posted by: hima_123

For Tapasya removing all traces of marriage.....its like "der aaye durust aaye"....she should have done it earlier for sure....but now when she did it..its good...and she did it in style!😊...We might love Veer Tapasya pair..but not the way it happened.

Not that I approve of whatever she did earlier...like creating misunderstanding etc.... thats not done.yet using credit card/debit card isn't such a crime.

there is nothing wrong in using some money out of the credit card ..(if its her dad's -even then ...whatever part of property Jogi has inherited from his own parents-that he has not not earned on his own....he is bound to give Tapasya's due share out of it -even when he disowns his daughter......he cannot take that part of property away from her that Jogi got from his own dad...thats a rule BTW).....same way for whatever "mahaan" reasons The "Dharmaatma Veer" let Tapasya be in his house as his wife....he is supposed to give her some maintenance if Tapasya is not earning...whether he wants her in his life or not.

Tapasya "owns" some part of Jogi's property for sure...whether or not disowned by Jogi..and just might have some right to maintenance from Veer too (though it might be debatable ....but I am sure as she is an heiress..she can afford to pay back whatever excess money she has used from Veer's account)