IPC 498a Non bailable offence question ?

Page

Manasa Rekha

@manasa.123

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

Sorry guys!

I am thinking all legal ways now as it mentioned in TSMSP

How come Uma suits for IPC 498a?

I read the explanation online as below:

IPC 498 A : Matrimonial Cruelty (non bailable and non compoundable offence)

He need to be proved innocent to be released.

Explanation for the purpose of this section, "cruelty" means:

(a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide

or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or

(b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demands for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.

Edited by manasa.123 - 8 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

sneha

@sneha_17

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

Only IPC 366 is valid against Uma

Other sections are not, I am not sure why CVs added them

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

varsha79

@varsha79

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

Plz fwd this to cVs...dialogue writers...

On othef hand i feel what they showed in yestetdays episode... half baked truth ...n Kanak lying this section may apply..

For them Kanak was house arrested...😭 he was not allowed to meet anyone.. n she has to face shudhi...

Quote

-Rani

@-Rani

Trailblazer

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: varsha79
Plz fwd this to cVs...dialogue writers...
On othef hand i feel what they showed in yestetdays episode... half baked truth ...n Kanak lying this section may apply..

For them Kanak was house arrested...😭 he was not allowed to meet anyone.. n she has to face shudhi...

Kanak's brainless brothers keep saying she was not allowed to meet her family post marriage and that Uma kept her under house arrest, but they conveniently forget that Kanak had come back home 5 days after marriage and told lies to her family that she married a guy of her own choice and left at her own will. Uma wasn't there to put a gun to her head to take her home or she was not forced in anyway to to go back Ladanu, but she lied to her entire family and went back to Uma willingly.

Also why didn't Kanak clarify that it was her own decision not to involve her family and was never prohibited by Uma or his family from meeting her family on the contrary at many occasions Uma and his family wanted her to call and meet her family.

All 3 siblings are brainless and selfish 😡

Edited by -Rani - 8 years ago

Quote

Deepthy

@deeps07

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

drinkinh water from.feet..making her perform dasi test..dnt they come under harrasement...any women who has been forced to marry can get into.depression even if she had come.back to home..

but i agree that kanak should have told.the whole.story.and .let the law make its decision

Quote

varsha79

@varsha79

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: deeps07
drinkinh water from.feet..making her perform dasi test..dnt they come under harrasement...any women who has been forced to marry can get into.depression even if she had come.back to home..
but i agree that kanak should have told.the whole.story.and .let the law make its decision

Giving test was kanak choice... nobody forced her