Fans are upset because that industry didn’t support Fighter. - Page 2

Most from Industry didn’t support animal either 

You have to earn it 

Your product needs to make solid impact  , good or bad 

I said this before repeating again

The craze of animal impact salaar, dunki and now fighter 

Animal on social media trending better than fighter 

Edited by Briaahna - 3 months ago

Originally posted by: Briaahna

Most from Industry didn’t support animal either 

You have to earn it 

Your product needs to make solid impact  , good or bad 

I said this before repeating again

The craze of animal impact sakaar, dunki and now fighter 

Animal on social media trending better than fighter 

yes animal earned it, but tbh that movie was vomit inducing, it didn’t make sense at all. Fighter is an attempt to a new genre and they did an amazing job, industry support depending on numbers is a screwed up logic, in that way anyone can make a trashy toxic masculinity hyper active movie. 

Anyway my point stands nobody supported, even when the movie is doing decent. That’s ok too as long as the target audience loved it. 

Originally posted by: MiVida_Messi

yes animal earned it, but tbh that movie was vomit inducing, it didn’t make sense at all. Fighter is an attempt to a new genre and they did an amazing job, industry support depending on numbers is a screwed up logic, in that way anyone can make a trashy toxic masculinity hyper active movie. 

Anyway my point stands nobody supported, even when the movie is doing decent. That’s ok too as long as the target audience loved it. 

 I guess janta wants to pay for animal to vomit rather than pay for fighter . So sad 

Originally posted by: Briaahna

 I guess janta wants to pay for animal to vomit rather than pay for fighter . So sad 

Yes mass centers, that shows how much majority still believes in trashy males inducing trauma and calling themselves alpha, it’ll take 50 more years to change this I guess and these people think they made art 😝

Anyways Fighter  won’t have 500 Crores but atleast no gender will be offended and everyone will love it 😊 

It crossed my mind that Akshay, in his usual manner, might have shared something with us. However, to my surprise, he is now engrossed in promoting his very own movie. 

It appears that a multitude of ventures are currently underway, causing everyone to prioritise their own interests. Nevertheless, the brilliance of "Fighter" shall shine through, undeterred by any external factors.

I regret to inform you that I have not yet had the pleasure of indulging in the movie you speak of, thus rendering me unable to provide an elaborate critique. However, I must assert that even from the mere glimpse offered by the trailer, it becomes abundantly clear that the absence of Deepika would have elevated this project to unparalleled heights of excellence.

Fighter doesn't bring anything fresh to the table. Plus, the box office numbers aren't making any headlines. By the end of next month, it'll probably be one of those movies nobody even remembers existed.

Originally posted by: carisma2

It crossed my mind that Akshay, in his usual manner, might have shared something with us. However, to my surprise, he is now engrossed in promoting his very own movie. 

It appears that a multitude of ventures are currently underway, causing everyone to prioritise their own interests. Nevertheless, the brilliance of "Fighter" shall shine through, undeterred by any external factors.

I regret to inform you that I have not yet had the pleasure of indulging in the movie you speak of, thus rendering me unable to provide an elaborate critique. However, I must assert that even from the mere glimpse offered by the trailer, it becomes abundantly clear that the absence of Deepika would have elevated this project to unparalleled heights of excellence.

Did Chatgpt write this?

Originally posted by: carisma2

It crossed my mind that Akshay, in his usual manner, might have shared something with us. However, to my surprise, he is now engrossed in promoting his very own movie. 

It appears that a multitude of ventures are currently underway, causing everyone to prioritise their own interests. Nevertheless, the brilliance of "Fighter" shall shine through, undeterred by any external factors.

I regret to inform you that I have not yet had the pleasure of indulging in the movie you speak of, thus rendering me unable to provide an elaborate critique. However, I must assert that even from the mere glimpse offered by the trailer, it becomes abundantly clear that the absence of Deepika would have elevated this project to unparalleled heights of excellence.

Why are you sounding like you are writing for an English language exam 

Originally posted by: MiVida_Messi

Yes let’s compare brand Raju Hirani with Sid Anand ..

Compare the budgets..compare the genre..& do the math..a 250cr budget mass action with a 120cr social..and if dunki got trolled at making 200cr why expect applause for fighter? 

I really don't care if celebrities support each other's movies or not....it doesn't make a difference at the end of the day......Salman and SRK are each other's friend and still their fans are always bashing them......lol..

Having said this.....I am honestly a tad bit disappointed in SRK not tweeting for Fighter........I will never forget how Hritik wrote an open letter and supported Aryan on that drug fiasco......while most celebrities shied away....and I could understand why....but for Hritik to take a huge risk when he has 2 young sons of his own......supported Aryan/SRK at that difficult time....I would have loved if SRK had said something about Fighter.....not that it would have made any difference to the final outcome of Fighter....Hritik is a huge superstar and doesn't need any help for visibility for his movies...

Waise most of SRK fans .......liked the movie and put out good reviews on twitter...