Originally posted by: VimalPanMasala
An Indian Institution requires a full 4 year degree in acting alongside multiple years of preparation. It is very time consuming. No one in this generation has been able to debut from an Indian Institution under the age of 30 (Zahaan Kapoor, Junaid Khan..etc are big theatre artists and Indian Institution Actors but both are quite old).
For an actress now that is unthinkable with a shelf life of like 40ish at best to debut at 30. We do have rare cases like Tripti, Aditi and Mrunal seeing fame at an "older age" but the star value has diminished in the public's eyes.
Sara already has a personal acting coach but a personal coach/formal acting training doesn't always work for everyone. Bobby Deol needed 20+ years with a coach to be an adequate actor.
Some people are spontaneous and do their best acting without guidance. Some people just have "it" but are clueless offstage.
For example, Alia Bhatt is someone who could learn with a traditional coach. The pros of that is that she improved quite consistently, but the con of that is that she can also regress/forget her acting skills faster if she does not keep up [which is why she keeps an eye on her competitors].
Ranveer Singh is someone who is more spontaneous at acting. He can make a mediocre script excellent but he mostly goes off the director's vision.
One way is not better than the other, but it's safe to say spontaneity is not working out for Sara like it did for Saif or Kareena. The reason why a lot of people debut cold is because the Indian audience tends to significantly prefer spontaneous actors, but that's no excuse to debut with bad skills.
comment:
p_commentcount