None of Vicky/Ranveer comes close to RK in terms of screen presence, acting & versatility.
RK has always experimented with his films. He acted in movies like Barfi, Rajneeti & Rockstar in the initial phase of his career. It is not his fault that JJ, Tamasha, BV & Roy flopped. He is always willing to take risks.
On the other hand, Ranveer always does periodic films of SLB & Masala Movies of Rohit Shetty. Why don't PPL call out this? Just because he's an OUTSIDER?
Coming to Vicky, let him do some movies other than patriotic films. Then, it can be judged but I do feel Ranveer is better than Vicky
Ye wala poll mein mera opinion
Ranveer - Iske paas sabse versatile filmography hai aur ye actor bahut mast hai, variety ke roles kiya hai. Periodic films mein Bajirao jaisa positive aur Khilji jaisa negative dono hi role bahut achhe se attempt kiya aur repetitive nahi lagta
Fir Gully boy, BBB, Lootera jaisa films bhi hai
Koi role mein merko aisa nahi lagta jaisa ki repeat performance hai
Ye mass movie kiya Simba uss mass movie mein Ott acting bhi ache se kar liya
Edited by FlyOnTheWall - 4 months ago
Vicky - Vicky ko mai jab movie mein dekhta hu to aisa nahi laga kabhi bhi kisi point par ki us role mein Vicky Kaushal kahi par bhi hai
Jaisa wo role ko approach karta hai wo merko pasand hai
Aur Sardar Udham to alag hi level hai
Filmography utna bada nahi hai, actor comparatively new hai lekin dono Ran se better emote karta hai dialogue delivery mein bhi dono se better hai
Ranbir - Pahla film mein koi impact nahi, SLB jo sabko unke career ka best performance diya wo Bira se kaam nahi nikalwa paya
Rockstar mein merko ek number ka laga tha
Lekin Rockstar ke merko koi performance utna acha nahi laga
Abhi Brahmastra mein kon bolega ki ye actor 17 movies kiya hai aur isko Bollywood ka best actor mante hain bahut log
Filmography utna versatile nahi hai
Mass film attempt kiya Besharam usme bhi acha performance nahi diya
Topic started by FlyOnTheWall
Last replied by rckRadhe