Originally posted by: theeki.mithai
I looked through the entire thread and didn't see a single comment "insinuating" that she looks like a hooker. Sure you didn't just make that up?
awould have mistaken her to be something else if spotted on road? what exactly does that insinuate. thus forum does not require you to make up things.. it provides you with enough ammunition as it is to roll your eyes in disgust.. at some very sick mentalities
Edit: okay that post has been deleted😆 Anyhow there was a post stating what i said above about Gauri
Rich coming from you. You have the audacity to call people out for their "sick mentalities" when it comes to your SRK's mami, phuphi, beti, bhanji, biwi, behen, khaala, mausi but you have no problem placing blame (or "responsibility" in your words) on gang rape victims in another thread which is also on the first page right now, seen below.
http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=4927728
Pray tell why should anyone on here give a crap about your selective outrage over women's clothing or izzat when you display such contrasting views depending on whose izzat in question?
Secondly, women only dress up in body hugging clothes to show their curves and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. You need to change your mindset if "curves" is such a taboo word for you. Ain't nobody going to a business meeting or a church, temple wearing Herve Leger but if a woman or a teenager wants to show her curves off in a tight dress in a club or any other appropriate venue, more power to her. People are free to comment on it, appreciate it or heck even criticize the look if they want.
Lastly, Betty didn't insinuate anything about Suhana being a hooker, you pulled that out of your own think tank. She was talking about Gauri, not that I agree with Betty, but perhaps you should comprehend better before going around accusing people.
Edited by Chameli_billi - 6 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount