Originally posted by: Cpt.DudleySmith
Yikes. So now not replying to creepy stalkerish sexually charged emails is creepy instead of I dunno...sending those creepy emails? Jeez, kitna girenge yeh Kangunazis. 🤢
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread- 25th August 2025
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 25 Aug 2025 EDT
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai August 26, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
ANSHUMAN GONE 25.8
A study On Miss Geetanjali Armaan Poddar
AFTER MATHh. 26.8
Deepika vs Katrina wars…World War 3 👀
IMDB's most beautiful actresses in the world. Kriti & Hania in top 10
Anupamaa 25 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Parineeti Chopra is pregnant
A Study on Miss Abhira "Jogan" Sharma
Navri - The Hawasi Mistress
Navri’s Love
Punishment to kill one or five is same
Maza nahi aaya😒
Who killed Anshuman; mara kaise ?
New Katrina and Hrithrik Roshan ad for Rado
Vicky Kaushal’s Mahavatar postponed to 2027
Who should cliff off
🇮🇳 Big News for IndiaForums Members! 🇮🇳
Originally posted by: Cpt.DudleySmith
Yikes. So now not replying to creepy stalkerish sexually charged emails is creepy instead of I dunno...sending those creepy emails? Jeez, kitna girenge yeh Kangunazis. 🤢
Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan
All I'm saying is that Hrithik and Kangana were defiantly in some kind of relationship. Hrithik is known for his affairs that's why his wife left him!
I'm not saying that Kangana or right or what not. I am simply saying they defiantly hooked up and Hrithik should admit that
Originally posted by: cricketfan1
Silly thread!
Originally posted by: .rasgulla.
Ego pe war kia tumne meri since I posted on this thread.. Let me report you now
A long interview split into 7 parts.
Remember the children's story we were told when young, about the boy who cried wolf? The boy kept fooling the village folk with lies until one day, his own karma caught up with him.
The Hrithik-Kangana legal saga has been going on for some time now. Ever since it came into public domain, my first instinctive reaction was to take the side of Kangana Ranaut. And, this was way before her public outpourings.
Why did I take her side initially? Because extramarital affairs are commonplace in Bollywood and her insinuation of an affair was not exactly unbelievable.
Hrithik is no saint.
But, nor is Kangana Ranaut, I discovered, as the case unravelled.
As the case progressed and the facts came to light, the picture painted by Kangana Ranaut didn't make any sense whatsoever. The image of Hrithik as a psychotic stalker, hacking into her computer, the proposal in Paris, of her undying love for Hrithik and the 7-year long relationship while being in other relationships with Adhyayan Suman, Ajay Devgn (supposedly, as claimed by Kangana herself in a past interview), or some random foreigner!
The only evidence she has is one photoshopped picture of Hrithik and her from a Bollywood party which Suzanne Khan has dismissed, confirming her own presence at the same event. It is like any other picture from a typical Bollywood insider party. It is suspicious how there is no evidence of any engagement... a ring, a dress, flight tickets, hotel room bookings, passport visa matches, etc. Come to think of it, an engagement is a serious commitment to take it to the next level. Isn't it strange that there is nothing from Kangana's side to prove her alleged engagement?
How is it that there is not a single piece of evidence provided by Kangana Ranaut to the police, till date, to validate her claims of an affair?
Kangu using Feminism card,one sided Barkha Dutt interview
Mind you, I am no fan of either of them. I've gone way past that juvenile stage of being any celebrity's fangirl. Back then, when the controversy freshly erupted, I questioned Kangana's interview with noted journalist Barkha Dutt. I found the interview suspiciously one-sided in perspective. I was disappointed both as a viewer and as someone who had deep respect for Barkha Dutt as a journalist and her illustrious body of work.
Ms Dutt did not ask any of the tough questions and let Kangana Ranaut have a field day in her interview. The interview seemed propagandist and staged to me. Even if it wasn't so, Ms Dutt's fondness for the actress was pretty evident and it overruled her stance as a journalist, who is meant to grill and put the guest literally on the hot seat. All we, viewers, got to see was an empathetic Ms.Dutt being magnanimous towards the poor victim, Ms Ranaut.
The Hrithik-Kangana case is not even remotely related to feminism, as Barkha Dutt and Kangana Ranaut were trying to portray. It remains, till date, a serious allegation of criminal offences entailing lies, manipulation, stalking, online harassment etc.
Why is it preposterous to believe that men can be victims of stalking too, and they can also exercise their power of saying no' to a relationship? Is consent only restricted to women?
By giving this case a feminist' angle, both of them are not helping the cause of feminism in any way on the contrary, they're hurting it. Regardless of their headline-worthy quotes.
If the interview was about Kangana's lifestyle and personal choices, you could bring the feminism angle to it. Like Sushmita Sen, who is unapologetic about her lifestyle. A single woman and mother, she has been in various serious and not-so-serious consensual relationships. If the interview was about a woman's right to live her life the way she deems right, like any man, you can bring feminism into the picture. Kudos to women who have the courage to lead an open and transparent life in a highly judgemental society like ours. To Kangana Ranaut's credit, I do like her take and thoughts on feminism and women's liberation. Her most recent being: "Having sex is fun for a man, but for a woman, it's almost criminal.
But, this is a legal case for God's sake. You cannot bring feminism into the picture and use it to your advantage. That's manipulating and playing around with the public's sentiments and feelings in an attempt to sway and seduce them onto your side. A talent which Ms Ranaut possesses in plenty, like her own dialogue in "Simran (which she penned herself) "Ladko ko patana ek talent hota hai (seducing guys is a talent).
Likewise, I'm sure, "Public ko patana aur ullu banana bhi ek talent hota hai (seducing and playing the public for fools is also a talent).
More people (men and women alike) I meet in daily life are questioning Ms Ranaut's version, sans any proof.
https://x.com/gulteofficial/status/1928065265289281923?s=46 t=74Fftld4jR1M5tPxEU7sHA Can we all agree that majority of the industry doesn't like...
https://www.indiaforums.com/article/govindas-flight-video-controversy-raises-eyebrows-as-internet-debates-intent-behind-unsettling-child_223834
https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/kamal-haasan-kannada-controversy-remark-thug-life-statement-of-love/article69629449.ece
https://x.com/Only_4Salman/status/1925453891115667698 Releasing on whose Independence day ?
Is IF so dead? I didn’t see a single post about this, when the Internet has been talking about it for the last one day. Babil Khan posted a...
126