BV Episode Discussion Thread #6 - DTN pg 106 & 107 - Page 2

First Previous

Page

118

Next Last

Frequent Posters

maria13

@maria13

Goldie

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: SPuja
There can be more than one positive characters. It is not that conflict of interest arises only between a positive and negative person. Sometimes - both the opposing parties are right in their own way. And that is what the demand of the track. Similar to the track where they made J as cheater - there was no need for J to cheat two women. He was right in asserting his right as choice of life partner - and Anandi also right if she demanded her rights as wife.

Creatives cannot show both parties as right because in that way they cannot show their obsession Anandi as the only right therefore they show other party as wrong to highlight Anandi

To glorify Anandi and whitewash Singhs they defeated adult choice in front of child marriage which was one of the worst messages , a social message based show can give . I mean just think how much they screwed the mentality of even educated people who were coming with these theories here on this forum Jagya should realize the value of Anandi He should suffer for leaving her

Isnt this the glorification of child marriage ? This is what BV cvs exactly did glorifying child marriage through Anandi Jagya Gauri triangle

With Mangala positive Anandi cannot be highlighted ,therefore destroy Mangala

Too bad cvs do not think of improving Anandi's character but they butcher every other Positive character parallel to her . if we look at Anandi's own character sketch without comparing the mistakes of other characters with her Anandi on her own is worst sketched character Too dull . , flawed and with no growth . She never learns and is nothing on her own without strong support with her which she is blessed to have through out her life so far in the form of Jagya , Singhs , then Shiv and now again Jagya .

Edited by maria13 - 8 years ago

Quote

maria13

@maria13

Goldie

Posted: 8 years ago

@hisusmita

Some people read half, and start commenting, mocking.

It was said the name Nandini was given by Anandi and Shiv. There is no place of Jagya in that.

As the name was Nandini someone mentioned about J , so it has been said.

Anyways, who cares better not to respond certain posts

Bold above

Lols if you don't care and have such an attitude then why are you responding to our posts we did not beg to you to respond to our posts Strange you claim you dont care about our posts but is the first one to mock our posts 🥱

and we have read then replied We don't reply like you You were talking about there is no place for Jagya as if he was desperate to have a place in naming Anandi's kids🤪If you can reply in your great Anandi's favor we can too reply for others after all people come to this forum to discuss the serial and characters

Edited by maria13 - 8 years ago

Quote

kate-nic

@kate-nic

Senior Member

Posted: 8 years ago

[QUOTEShinya]If the bullet did not succeed in killing anandi, how would it have killed jagya ?😕

I dont think anyone said she saw the bullet and pushed J ... 😆 people are talking as if the bullet was nicely coming in his direction like a flying disc.😆

She saw the man with gun behind jagya and her instant reaction was to push him and run away from the scene. By that time, the bullet was already fired which she got.

It wont be right to say that she deliberately took the bullet.

And it is completely an invalid argument to say that she should have been selfish and let the bullet hit jagya when all that she saw was a man with a gun behind jagya.

[/QUOTE]

well said shinya if the bullet could not kill Anandi how some people are so sure it would have killed Jagya 😕 He may be saved too just like her . Its not like Anandi had died for Jagya that some people are saying she took Jagya's death on her She should have let him die becoming selfish 😕

People are saying Anandi 's life would a lot better without Jagya she should have let him die ??. Her marriage with Jagya was the best thing happened to her She would be nothing without Singhs not even married to some people's hero Shiv because in that bilaria Shiv would probably never know who is she 😆Those were singhs . Dadisaa who fixed her marriage with Shiv and she enjoyed singhs luxuries and even till now is enjoying so marriage with Jagya was the best thing happened to Anandi , she got a family like singhs and she have a life long best friend in Jagya . Jagya by now has done more for her than she has done for him She is indebted to him not he . Some people brag about Anandi saved Jagya's life but forget Jagya has saved not only Anandi's life and honor but also saved her children too . Anandi only loses her children Its Jagya who brings them back to her 😆

Edited by kate-nic - 8 years ago

Quote

Vidya

@Shinya

IF-Rockerz

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: kate-nic
well said shinya if the bullet could not kill Anandi how some people are so sure it would have killed Jagya 😕 He may be saved too Its not like Anandi had died for Jagya that some people are saying she took Jagya's death on her She should have let him die instead becoming selfish 😕

People are saying Anandi 's life would a lot better without Jagya she should have let him die Lols . Her marriage to Jagya was the best thing happened to her She would be nothing without Singhs not even married to some people's hero Shiv because in that backward bilaria Shiv would probably never know who is she 😆Those were singhs . Dadisaa who fixed her marriage with Shiv and she enjoyed singhs luxuries and even till now is enjoying so marriage with Jagya was the best thing happened to Anandi , she got a family like singhs and then she have a life long best friend in Jagya . Jagya by now has done more for her than she has done for him She is indebted to him not he . Some people brag about Anandi saved Jagya's life but Jagya has saved not only Anandi's life and honor but also saved her children too . Anandi only loses her children Its Jagya who brings them back to her 😆

[/QUOTE]

Seriously people are debating about the bullet as if it was Anandi's prerogative to decide who the bullet should hit and who the bullet should kill. 🤣 If it hits Anandi, she will survive, but if it hits Jayga, he will surely die. 🤣

Bhairo saved anandi's life by giving her immediate treatment. No one is giving Bhairo any credit, but all credit is given to anandi for saving jagya's life which in any case would not have ended even if he was hit by the bullet.

Just like bhairo saved anandi's life, he would have also saved his son's life. 😆

Edited by Shinya - 8 years ago

Quote

kate-nic

@kate-nic

Senior Member

Posted: 8 years ago

Thats it

How can people say Jagya would have died ? Just like Anandi was saved ,Jagya would be saved too but this specific statement Anandi should have let Jagya die made me laugh why would Bhairon not taken his son to hospital , why would the doctor not treated Jagya Why he won't be saved ?😆

i am sure if it would be Jagya who would be hit by bullet in same way as Anandi Imagine the scene in reverse Jagya would have seen the goon and pushed Anandi out of way and in the process would be hit by the fired bullet .i am sure he would be given no credit by same people who are excessively glorifying Anandi 😆Its favoritism coming here which is clear from this that it is being said Jagya would have died if he would have been shot. Tell me one good reason why he could not saved like Anandi was ?😆Yes both could have died but both could be saved too but it is not certain that Anandi is only one who could be saved while Jagya would definitely have died 😆

Edited by kate-nic - 8 years ago

Quote

Stephi

@Stephi

IF-Sizzlerz

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: maria13
@hisusmita
Some people read half, and start commenting, mocking.

It was said the name Nandini was given by Anandi and Shiv. There is no place of Jagya in that.

As the name was Nandini someone mentioned about J , so it has been said.

Anyways, who cares better not to respond certain posts

Bold above

Lols if you don't care and have such an attitude then why are you responding to our posts we did not beg to you to respond to our posts Strange you claim you dont care about our posts but is the first one to mock our posts 🥱

and we have read then replied We don't reply like you You were talking about there is no place for Jagya as if he was desperate to have a place in naming Anandi's kids🤪If you can reply in your great Anandi's favor we can too reply for others after all people come to this forum to discuss the serial and characters

Actually Maria ,to be fully accurate , discussion started with :

''Nimboli named her doll Nandini.😆

That says a lot. How she craves for Anandi's love. We , when want something and dont get it ,we want that for our kids when we grow up , same way when little girls play with doll they fullfill all the desires thru the doll, just the way N did during K's wedding.

BV's subtle ways to show things''

So ,It is possible some people read half but some people don't even remember their own words😆
Edited by Stephi - 8 years ago

Quote

Stephi

@Stephi

IF-Sizzlerz

Posted: 8 years ago

@That's because Anandi is the main lead and she is a positive character

Really sad and completely useless if the main lead can be shown as a positive character only by making all others as the bad guys. Edited by Stephi - 8 years ago

Quote

Stephi

@Stephi

IF-Sizzlerz

Posted: 8 years ago

@ kate -nic

I totally agree with everything you said. I will not quote all of it , but this sentence of yours
''People are saying Anandi 's life would a lot better without Jagya she should have let him die''
I won't to comment on how hate-filled it sounds.
But what I want to say is if Anandi ,as a young child, had no other option and had no the right to choose but to be a Balika Vadhu, what happened later. Her choice was to stay in BH. She refused to go with her parents. What happened after Shiv's death.?Her choice was again to go and live with BH people, including Jagya and his wife. What's happening right now.? She has her SN , still she chooses to stay in BH.

So , if Anandi 's life would be a lot better without Jagya ,who forces her to live with him in the same house even today?

Quote

fast trak

@fast trak

IF-Rockerz

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: Stephi
@That's because Anandi is the main lead and she is a positive character

Really sad and completely useless if the main lead can be shown as a positive character only by making all others as the bad guys.

Everybody is not negative in the show. Right now utterly negative characters are Akhiraj and family that includes his bhabhisa Mangala Devi. Rest are positive.

One is not needed to become negative to show other positive. A negative will be negative irrelevant of whoever is around them.

Quote

Vidya

@Shinya

IF-Rockerz

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: fast trak

Everybody is not negative in the show. Right now utterly negative characters are Akhiraj and family that includes his bhabhisa Mangala Devi. Rest are positive.
One is not needed to become negative to show other positive. A negative will be negative irrelevant of whoever is around them.

When mangala was in Jhalra, she was not negative inspite of living among criminals.

How only after anandi entered her life, she became negative? Was it anandi's influence or what?

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 ... 118