Originally posted by: fatssrilanka
Shruti, I too had the same thing in my mind. How come Lakshman gets married to Urmila. Now I got the answer. This has to be Manthara's politics.
Shruthi, I don't think Manthara may engineer plans to get Bharath married to Mandovi but she will fro sure convince Kaikeyi for Ram & Sita wedding by saying Sita has no royal background and hence it will help her to get Bharath installed on the throne (like people may question her rights to sit on the throne as queen). And about chronicalogy, Mandovi is elder to Urmila and Shruthkirthi and so it is on their birth order they will get married to the brothers. And about the other 3 pairs, I think Raja Janak might rise this request as he had been updated by his daughters (when they were kids) that they will get married to the same house so that they shall not part away from each other. Or that might be done by either shatanand or Mata Gargi or Yagnyavalk.[/QUOTBINGO..!! Brilliant , I agree with your point of view, ππ about Mantharas reasoningπ³
Originally posted by: daydreamers
Well my reply got vanished π π shall type it again...π
Shruthi first and foremost thank you for this much needed post...π I had thot of posting but you were the super fast express πSita's dialogue made my day... I was simply like " please teach our generation smthn". Urmila was symbolic of the youth and sita as her guide... It was so beautiful...βοΈThe lunch scene was again so deep!!! You rightly pointed it out shruthi... I see it in a different yet similar way..πI don't know much but whatever I have seen in my immediate families and relations I have noticed one thing... Whenever a jamai comes to his in-laws with his family, the first due respect is given to the elders of his family, like serve them first, then the younger ones and at the end their jamai... Its quite similar to the way a daughter in law is related in her in-laws house.. "Treated as a family member". So at the in-laws the jamai becomes the direct family member and his family as an indirect family...So here was the same... Laxman was served first and then ram.. As ram has become a direct family... Wen the other sisters get married off, they'll first serve ram and then the others as ram is the eldest of siblings...Its juz a token of love,respect and care that one shows to his/her spouse's family...Today's generation needs to get one thing clear, it is not needed to buy extravagant gifts to keep your relatives or in-laws happy... All that is needed a bit of care and attention...Prior to this I was concerned of the details of Ramayana but now I feel if we are getting such symbolic scenes am ready to ignore the distortions...As it is, the stories do change with tym, don't they? But morally they are very much needed... Am so glad the cv's did that one thing so remarkably... Its good to teach a lesson to the youth who are forgetting their ways... And nothing can be better than Ramayana as all age groups watch it.. How so ever distorted it might be, it has the viewership... Some watch to see what is unseen and others watch it to see how far they ruin it.. What so ever the motive is fullfilled π
Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@daydreamers thanks for the appreciation and you have put forth another point beautifully. Yes Son in law is the immediate family and his family the extended one. And that is how relations used to happen in old days. I have my aunts and all who when they see a new person manage to say how we are related. And me beyond cousin or the immediate first indirect relation will stand π. Because that is our knowledge. We know about moon and stars, we know about US and UK, we know what happened in 1947 but doesn't know our neighbor hood or our roots.
When SKR started my only need was whether the heart of the show was in right place. Is it carrying the essence of Ramayana. As far as I am feeling the essence as a person who has read multiple literature on Indian mythology I will continue to watch it.
Originally posted by: TOTAL-ROMANTIC
I am glad & happy you said that, which I have highlighted..π€ loved everything you have pointed out π
qOriginally posted by: shruthiravi
@vipraja welcome to the forum and agree to you. There is so much pain around that too for silly reasons. Do post more and would like to interact with you more.
comment:
p_commentcount