Bad,days ahead for Urmi - Page 3

I am copy pasting what Shinya wrote already

"Teesa is a nice lady not because she loves nimboli but because she is good at heart, she does no harm to anyone, neither through words nor actions.

And Harki is not a nice lady not because she does not love nimboli but because she is cruel and wicked. She was cruel even to her own daughter... It is just that she is helpless before her husband.

Urmi's act was good but I cant call her courageous yet, because whatever she is doing is out of her ignorance about that family... She may continue to raise her voice as long as she has her father's strong support.

Other 5 ladies do not have any support."

Obviously some people will try to ignore this and post same thing again and again - as if ek jhooth sau bar bolne se sach ho jata hai. Harki does not get sympathy for what she is doing - Urmi is getting sympathy when she is innocent (when Kundan beat her, then when he raped her etc.) not only from characters like Mangala and Nimboli and chagni but also from forum members. If someone tries to ignore it selectively - then what others can do?

As regards the women of Akhera house - still biased views 😆. Nimboli is not fighting - she is questioning because she does not know the consequences of her actions - it has been proved time and again that in order to show her innocence - creatives are making her act like a dumb. Similar action by Urmi also yesterday - she is young and perhaps this is the first time in her life she saw such cruelty - so she spoke - but she is older than Nimboli - perhaps she will understand the consequences of speaking up. If she shuts down - it will not necessarily a weakness of character - it can be called being practical. Has anyone seen a house where women gang up against men to fight? Where these women stand in society? The net savvy urban people don't know the reality of rural society. It rarely happens like the story of Ganga/DS and Anandi. Of course, this is a story - the writers can very well show Anandi coming and winning from Akhera - it is their story and their whims. But that cannot undermine other characters or make other characters weak. It is just that creatives cannot give side characters more credit than the lead.

Why should she not question? Is taking it silently a virtue?

Net savvy urban people may not know what rural society is like😛

But even among the savvy urban educated people women like Mangala and Harki exist. It is nothing to do with education and financial independence or lack of it.

It is more about how one approaches life.you either have it in you to fight or you give up.

By the way creatives are repeating their tracks - was not Mangala saving Nimboli quite similar to Anandi saving Ratan 😆. Even the method - tying dupatta was similar. But at that time it was women power, heroic and what not. This time it is plain boring - for some people action does not matter - only favorite matters.

Anandi was fighting that man and what he stands for her and yet she saved his life simply because for her the fight is about actions and not about people.Ratan was a cruel man who beat up a woman and snatched her baby from her yet she had compassion to save his life

Mangala I wonder if she would have bothered about that helpless little baby if that baby didn't stir up her maternal instincts.Mangala is all about individuals whether she cares for them or not. Come to think of it would have Mangala have saved if that person falling off the ledge was Kundan?

Saving Ratan - would Anand do the same with Akheraj?Probably yes probably no.

Why is it so difficult to accept somebody who didn't even courage to own up to the prank what was meant to be harmless has gone wrong stood up for someone gotten beaten up and punished for that so difficult to appreciate?

Where did that spoilt brat and coward get that spunk to stand up for her mother in law who doesn't even care for her?

Why is that girl not appreciated for questioning her husband about his indifference to his mother's sufferings and humilaition?

She was troubling Nandini but Nandini was troubling the girl too. Other than that she was just a brat who is a bit stupid.

It is okay if Mangala wears Devi mask to implement her agenda but it is not okay if the girl sees her father as her support system?

Both are putting up with same kind of men so why such disdain for Urmi?

Her parents got her married without going into details about the groom and later they were too scared of the stigma that will be attached to them if they break up marriage and sent her into this hell .

She was only trying to secure her position as a wife and get rid of souten.

Was she so evil ?Just because she doesn't take the suffering silently and instead makes noises her concerns and troubles can be over looked?

How different were these pranks these two girls pulled on each other from the ones Abhi and Shivam pulled on each other?

Just like she scared Nandin wearing that mask she was scaring Akheraj and family using her father as a weapon or a mask

So why disregard her goodness just because she troubled that girl who herself was asking for trouble/After all aren't they vying for the same place?

Why is it so difficult to accept that Mangala Harki Urmi all three are travelling in the same boat and trying to cope with circumstances as best as they can?

For Harki her children relieve her from her dreary existence just like for Mangala it is that little girl who made a difference to her life

Mangala uses her mask to take out her frustrations and Harki yells and screams at Nandini

Nandini just tries to find joy in small things in order to escape.

Mangala Harki are afreaid of consequnces may be Urmi also will be come like them.

Nandini keeps questioning them and faces the consequences so why is it considered as foolishness? She doesn't care for consequences she knows she will be beaten up but still questions them why is that called stupidity?