could Karna ever be friend of Bheem and Arjun if truth was revealed?

I had this question for quite some time now , after so many persons do cry if that could happen if kaju was real and i am also one of them but this possibility was irking me

i have always read in epic and in interpretations of writer Karna and BheemArjun were sworn enemies who just couldn't tolerate each other, Yudhisthir,Nakul and Sahadev were his enemies too but they were way mild

so if Kunti revealed the truth Yudhisthir would have been the first who would accept Karna since he mourned over Karna's death the most in epic so its easily can be assumed that Yudhisthir not only would accept but would be most respectful to Karna

Nakul and Sahadev had no proper say , they would accept what they were given so they would accept their eldest brother without second thought and would serve him

Karna on the other hand was not so bitter to Yudhisthir , since he accepted Yudhisthir deserved the throne over Duryodhan , so he too could accept Yudhisthir as a good mannered , mature, understanding brother
and Nakul-Sahadev would have been two kids for him so their arrogance was negligible for Karna , he would have showered affections to them

now question comes to the main two pandavas Bheema and Arjun , Karna was rival of arjun from Drona gurukul , on one hand Arjun thought Karna is associated with kauravas and Karna thought Arjun is wrongly favored by Drona and the bitterness increased later on Rangabhoomi so was there any chance for kaju to b real as they were enemies since childhood

and Bheem always insulted Karna right from rangabhoomi Karna too insulted Bheema their enmity were more fierce so could they be friend ever

was not it possible even Kunti revealed there would have been sibling rivalry between them and it was hard for them to accept each other

Considering that Kunti bothered to reveal the truth to Karna only just before the war, and she never really told her sons about Karna during all the time they were happy ruling in IP...

Once bheem had praised karna when he had said he was duryodhan's friend, not spy...bheem had praised karna's bravery saying only a true warrior can say that

and arjun also praised karna saying he is a great archer

and karna also shows respect towards them...so YES

@shani but after truth was revealed pandavas forgot all what karna did to them, yudhisthir was not accepting throne , arjun's gandiv fell down so if they come to know that before karna's death possibility was still they would accept him forgetting all (not to forget what both krishna and kunti did offer to him after knowing all his misdeeds so if he would have accepted then he would actually get those promised possessions), rather it would be karna who would want punishment upon him

@kriya but all what u mentioned happened in starbharat not mahabharath

I believe Karna, Bheema and ARjuna would have been not only friends but brothers

I voted for Yes.. It definately makes a difference knowing the other person is your flesh n blood..

@cots but krishna himself said kanin son too is rightful heir and Karna is a pandav by all norms
yudi wanted give throne to vrishketu so i think pandavas would offer throne to karna but karna might not accept

all pandav would have accepted him as brother my question would bhreemarjun be that comfortable withkarna

Yah of course they will...afterall karn is their eldest brother...so my vote for yes...

Originally posted by: Patrarekha

@cots but krishna himself said kanin son too is rightful heir and Karna is a pandav by all norms
yudi wanted give throne to vrishketu so i think pandavas would offer throne to karna but karna might not accept

all pandav would have accepted him as brother my question would bhreemarjun be that comfortable withkarna

and what about karna? i mean from karna's side?