Our history is NOT a myth - Page 4

but still we will have Indians themselves calling this mythology and supporting it, next we'll name this forum FairyLand. later someone will name our gods as elves and we'll say, naam me kya rakha hai.

This is for you, napster. 😊

Edited by sherlock - 10 years ago

Originally posted by: sherlock

Why the producers of the show are yet to sign you up as their main writer, I've no idea dear. 😊

God, there's sooo much wrong with this world. 

though the devils r doing a fine job with the show , but imagine a desi tadka to ruin it all 😆

Originally posted by: sherlock

@Napster:

The thing is, even if we are going to give any proof to those who don't wish to believe, they'll reject that proof. 

Secondly, if we'll tell them that if they don't wish to believe in our experience,no problem, they can get the proof THEMSELVES by following a few simple (in a sense) instructions, they won't do even that, so actually there's no way out. 😆

If I'm to say  that yes, I've seen Lord Sita Ram, who's going to believe me?? People here will think, this "sherlock" is either a liar or a lunatic. 😆 😆 Well, can't help it, I certainly can't be expected to deny my own personal experiences just because people will call me a lunatic.

However, while people have every right not to believe in a mere statement of mine, if I'm gonna tell them the they can test the veracity of my statement themselves, but for that they'll have to take some months out of their lives & do as I tell them to do, whose gonna do that????? 

So as I said, its an impossible situation. 😊

Edited by wildcat1994 - 10 years ago

Originally posted by: wildcat1994

GOD is a nameless, faceless being who doesn't need to be identified by some visible being.

but don't u realise...that GOD IS FLAWLESS?? he cannot commit a mistake..

but read ur own ramayan n BHAGVAD GITA n u'll ralise that v r actually not Nastikas but true believers of god...we know what god is..how he is!!!!! 

that is what v r saying...😆GOD resides inside the heart of every human...so, when evil rises...he guides us from within but only a select few like Ram n Krishna have the courage to listen to their heart...to the god within that heart...fight with evil n win...now, imagine...even Gandhiji fought with British to save India leaving a very bright future...how many had the courage to do that other than him??? but does that make him god??? do we worship him as god or we call him the MAHATMA??😳...we celebrate him but none worships him then how can we worship RAM or KRISHNA???😕

Originally posted by: wildcat1994

that is what v r saying...

Edited by sherlock - 10 years ago

Originally posted by: sherlock

What i said is NOT what you said, regardless of all these mental gymnastics, & getting Gandhi involved. 😊

It is very clear that your "God" has to fit in your concept of him to be considered as God by you, so your "God" is not an all powerful supreme entity residing in everyone's heart, he is a "nameless, faceless, non-entity" actually, who has to remain that way, for if ever he "committed the mistake" & crossed the "limits" set by YOU, & decided to acquire a name or face, he'll cease to be your God. 

my God on the other hand is beyond any rules, any limits. He can do anything that anyone can ever imagine, PLUS he can also do anything no one can ever imagine. He may remain un-manifest, he may manifest himself at infinite places at the same time, he remain in our hearts, & he can also appear before our eyes, because He is beyond rules. 

Our Understanding of a Supreme, omnipotent, omnipresent personality stands at 180 degrees to each other. Still, you're trying to make it look like I'm somehow validating your claims of a strange "God" contained inside man-made rules. Nothing can be further from the truth. 

Originally posted by: napster

👏 

Originally posted by: wildcat1994

i couldn't help it but if u mean what u said then according to u EVERY HUMAN SHOULD BE GOD...

Which sentence of mine from my post you quoted made you reach this conclusion?? Point out that sentence. 

so we don't need RAM or KRISHNA to prove to us his presence...

OK, no problem, but if your omnipresent "God" decides to appear before you as Shri Ram or Shri Krishna, why are you so hell bent on not allowing your "God" to do that?? Just because it clashes with your understanding of "God" who according to you has to necessarily remain "nameless & formless" & should never have a name or form?? Even though in the same breath you accept that "everything is God" which simply means that He is ALREADY, ALWAYS, & ETERNALLY manifest before us, not as a "nameless, formless non-entity" but having infinite names & forms, which is what I've been saying all along. So, what is your point here? Or is it that your single point agenda here is, "while I'll say great things like "everything is God & God is everything", still I'll single out the likes of Shri Ram or Shri Krishna as somehow being anyone but God"?

we worship him in every BEING...so for us...RAM=KRISHNA=SHIVA=ALL BEINGS=GOD..

Very Good. 

its u who believe that only Ram or Krishna or some other Hindu god is god and no one else!!!!

Which sentence of mine from my post you quoted made you reach this conclusion?? Point out that sentence.

the one reason...y we r a part of this forum too...right???😛😛

I am happy that you're a part of this forum & I hope the feeling is mutual.