Originally posted by: redeye2012
@funbuklover:
I personally think it is less about bahus stealing her sons, more about DIL disobedience. In one episode, she actually says, if I have 3 sons, then I have to have 3 DILs. So, that's less of an issue. Her big concern was that Aarti would not be able to take care of her (Scindia) family if she's always focused on Ansh. This fear set in on the day of the engagement when Aarti was talking so much about Ansh and then Ansh turned up and his behavior wasn't anything to write home about. And then there were other events that had Aarti disobeying her many times (not all justified). And after these events, G3's heart was set against Aarti and she became incapable of understanding Aarti's pain. And when G3 shed tears for Yash, none of us could empathize with G3 as a mother (though we felt for Yash). Finally, Aarti didn't turn anti-Scindia because that would defeat her purpose of remarriage. Another is Aarti's personality- her heart and mind is not as petty as G3. If she did turn anti-Scindia, what would she want to achieve in the end? She'll end up looking the bad one and who is she going to complain to, Yash? She knew she had to make her place there, but Ansh didn't help with his behavior. And for her, when the push came to shove, it was Ansh before anyone else.
comment:
p_commentcount