You are correct. But still think. The answer which I thought was different. Vijay is also the name of mythological character/characters. I will add one more option and will cut one option later to make it easier to crack.
And one more thing Vrish. There was no need to connect Shukracharya with Shukdevji through Yaduvansh and Kunti. We could have gone through Puruvansh only and also not upto Pandu (Like I found problem of going from Pandu to Shukdev considering Vichitravirya and Vyas both as his father in the same answer). I could stop at Shantanu only.😆
Shukracharya-Yayati-Shantanu-Vyas-Shukdev (5 degrees).
One more thing came to my mind Vrish as suggestion. Please add one more rule that we can't use the relation of Ascendant-Descendant more than once in an answer. Suppose if you tell me to relate Krishna with Dushasan and if I say - Krishna-Yayati (Krishna's ascendant)-Dushasan (Yayati's descendant) to better a great answer of someone else, that would be too funny and unfair attempt and will kill the game because that way any two characters can be connected just in 2 degrees by going back upto Manu or Vivaswan or Prajapati and coming back down. Or we can have a rule that we can use ascendant-ascendant more than once or descendant-descendant more than once in an answer but can't use both ascendant and descendant in the same answer. For example we can connect Shursen with Janmejay by using descendant twice (Once Shursen to Subhadra and once Subhadra to Janmejay to be her great grandchid).
And yes. I also thought the same as you and Varaali both thought but just asked about Kunti being a married female and changing family. But logically even according to me, Kunti has to be considered descendant of Yadu because she can't be considered as descendant of Puru even after the marriage in Puruvansh. We have to link her with Puru through Pandu only.
Edited by ShivangBuch - 12 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount