Would Veto publicity help Sinchan-Irfan?

Poll

Would the significance of being vetoed in and the publicity help SI?

Login To Vote
rocker1 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#1

What effect would being the first couple to be vetoed have on Sinchan - Irfan's popularity and next week's position?

Created

Last reply

Replies

5

Views

611

Users

5

Frequent Posters

rocker1 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#2

Hmm this adds fuel to my suspicion that judges wanted to keep southern spice well in the competition.. as well the other borderline jodi.. hence all the praise showered on both of them..

I suppose it's Gajji's plan to keep the competition tight and the interest alive..

Edited by shadyhtown - 19 years ago
Vikram_Singh thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#3
People who use to think Les and hari has brains their number may decrease. 😕
CarulinaTina thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 19 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: Vikram_Singh

People who use to think Les and hari has brains their number may decrease. 😕

Well said😆

saregama thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#5
I think what Leslie and Hari did were right on their part..... They are such an experienced and famous people that they must have thaught twice before using Veto power for Irfaan and Sinchan......There should be reason behind it otherwise why would they use it for Irfaan and Sinchan.......... Some people here say that this veto power should have been used on VN or RV but VN and RV despite being experienced in the field of singing couldnot perform upto the mark and could not attract people's attention so why should veto power should be used on them. But Irfaan and Sinchan despite being inexperienced and weak were improving a lot and there is always scope for improvement and this is exactly the reason judges used veto power on them.... Judges are really smart and they have used veto power on those poor people..... I dont think they have done wrong in using veto power for those poor young people who really needed it.
Edited by saregama - 19 years ago
nadabrahma thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 19 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: saregama

I think what Leslie and Hari did were right on their part..... They are such an experienced and famous people that they must have thaught twice before using Veto power for Irfaan and Sinchan......There should be reason behind it otherwise why would they use it for Irfaan and Sinchan.......... Some people here say that this veto power should have been used on VN or RV but VN and RV despite being experienced in the field of singing couldnot perform upto the mark and could not attract people's attention so why should veto power should be used on them. But Irfaan and Sinchan despite being inexperienced and weak were improving a lot and there is always scope for improvement and this is exactly the reason judges used veto power on them.... Judges are really smart and they have used veto power on those poor people..... I dont think they have done wrong in using veto power for those poor young people who really needed it.

I think they should have kept it for Ujjaini or Sharib's or Hrishikesh's team. Because they are far better than the rest. They are the best. My opinion.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".