My supports
Sugandha
Mampee
Mugdhaa
No Abhilasha bcoz she already reached significant place in VOI and no point in competing another show which just for new comers.
Mugdha cannot be compared with Sugandha or Abhilasha at all. Mugdha may be gud at opera kind songs, but she goes off key sometimes. (Even she went off note in her Hai Rama rendition, I dont know how the judges didnt notice that)Originally posted by: kingofdevil1
My all support to Sugandha for her trained voice. Once again it shows that if one knows classical then its easier to sing any type of song with finer changes.
My supports
Sugandha
Mampee
Mugdhaa
No Abhilasha bcoz she already reached significant place in VOI and no point in competing another show which just for new comers.
Originally posted by: lifeztuf
Mugdha cannot be compared with Sugandha or Abhilasha at all. Mugdha may be gud at opera kind songs, but she goes off key sometimes. (Even she went off note in her Hai Rama rendition, I dont know how the judges didnt notice that)
But Sugandha as well as Abhilasha have very strong classical base. They are 100% in sur. I'm sur the judges will notice the flaws in Mugdha's singing in her future performances.
Originally posted by: kingofdevil1
I think we should wait a little bit to start comparisons. They just gave 1 performance and the main show yet to get start. I hv no idea about Abhilasha's classical base, but wht i remember from VOI-1 that she was quite ordinary while singing tougher songs. I hope she has improved because she has a beautiful voice.
Mugdha has a unique voice and she has x-factor in her voice too. Hai rama is a very tough song also. I will wait for the next performances from all of these singers. wish them all well.
Originally posted by: kingofdevil1
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI1be1QhUFA&feature=related[/YOUTUBE]
Mugdha missed sur even in the 'O ri chori' hindi portion she sang in the initial audition. But yes her opera was excellent.Originally posted by: ..suresh555
I felt that mugdha missed sur. SUGANDHA IMPRESSED ME VERY MUCH.
comment:
p_commentcount