Thendral Tuesday- Jan 17, 2012 - Page 4

Thulz has been modicum of plain old-decency, humility, tenacity and hall-mark of patience, poise and grace under fire...except for two occasions when she has questioned the very foundation her relationship:

- When Thulz walked away from TA, T broke her own tenet about relationship: Cornerstone for relationship/affection is trust and not suspicion. While she may not have been suspicious about TA behavior directly, she had seeds of mistrust.

- In current episode when she mind-voiced about TA's relationship being distraction. Although her mind-voicing is a superficial hyperbole, she never ever uttered the same kind of words calling into question her relationship with MM who till this point has never been a human,.let alone been a father to her.

Why does she have different yard-stick for TA and MM? Till now, T has not tried to analyze why TA is behaving like a jerk. She has not heard TA's side of story, thus far. Yet, she is rushing to pre-judge TA while she has never questioned MM knowing full well a moron he was?

Relationship of Trust [which is what T claimed her's with TA to be], is based on willingness to look @ interest of others [i.e. TA] and not only self-interest [i.e. WIIIFM]. This leads raise a question- Is T's relationship TA is about convenience and her own self-serving interest of education??

Originally posted by: AnnaJay

Thanks for the fast update

Everyone will be brought under same roof by coming monday, who and what i mean by this you will know by this week. when charu decides to step forward everyone will be brought into picture by fate. What Charu need now is to make sure Thulasi is nomore in Tamizh's life to move forward so things are going to move towards it. The betrayer track which i mentioned along with another one is going to help things to move further from Charu's side.

Originally posted by: acornn

Thulz has been modicum of plain old-decency, humility, tenacity and hall-mark of patience, poise and grace under fire...except for two occasions when she has questioned the very foundation her relationship:

- When Thulz walked away from TA, T broke her own tenet about relationship: Cornerstone for relationship/affection is trust and not suspicion. While she may not have been suspicious about TA behavior directly, she had seeds of mistrust.

- In current episode when she mind-voiced about TA's relationship being distraction. Although her mind-voicing is a superficial hyperbole, she never ever uttered the same kind of words calling into question her relationship with MM who till this point has never been a human,.let alone been a father to her.

Why does she have different yard-stick for TA and MM? Till now, T has not tried to analyze why TA is behaving like a jerk. She has not heard TA's side of story, thus far. Yet, she is rushing to pre-judge TA while she has never questioned MM knowing full well a moron he was?

Relationship of Trust [which is what T claimed her's with TA to be], is based on willingness to look @ interest of others [i.e. TA] and not only self-interest [i.e. WIIIFM]. This leads raise a question- Is T's relationship TA is about convenience and her own self-serving interest of education??

Originally posted by: acornn

Thulz has been modicum of plain old-decency, humility, tenacity and hall-mark of patience, poise and grace under fire...except for two occasions when she has questioned the very foundation her relationship:

- When Thulz walked away from TA, T broke her own tenet about relationship: Cornerstone for relationship/affection is trust and not suspicion. While she may not have been suspicious about TA behavior directly, she had seeds of mistrust.

- In current episode when she mind-voiced about TA's relationship being distraction. Although her mind-voicing is a superficial hyperbole, she never ever uttered the same kind of words calling into question her relationship with MM who till this point has never been a human,.let alone been a father to her.

Why does she have different yard-stick for TA and MM? Till now, T has not tried to analyze why TA is behaving like a jerk. She has not heard TA's side of story, thus far. Yet, she is rushing to pre-judge TA while she has never questioned MM knowing full well a moron he was?

Relationship of Trust [which is what T claimed her's with TA to be], is based on willingness to look @ interest of others [i.e. TA] and not only self-interest [i.e. WIIIFM]. This leads raise a question- Is T's relationship TA is about convenience and her own self-serving interest of education??

The basic premise of the question: "Is Is T's relationship with TA is about convenience and her own self-serving interest of education??" is in the context of her disposition W.R.T. to MM [et al] and TA.

The question is not in an isolated context of T'n'TA relationship. T's affection and devotion towards TA is a complete one i.e. "Thulz like" [in its purity and pristineness] is devoid of any" strings attached" - is sorts of legend that needs no validation or credential establishment.

T as rightly noted, has been through one-room living hell under the tutelage of MM & GW-P for better part of her 20 years of existence with a hope that, the "horrible living condition" will change as MM will get know the real "Thulz" and that she is not like her "mom". Even when D,K and her fav patti @ several points urged T to "bolt from blue" [re: run-away], but, T steadfastly stayed the course until it finally dawned on MM during Vel marriage saga where TA played a pivot.

What made T stay the course which has made human out of morons like MM, Vel, et al?? It is her conviction and firm belief as she was "correct" and stayed the course no matter how bad the tide against her was, as stated by TA when admitting her in school.

T though has stayed with TA through thick and thin, has every right to be mad and angry @ TA - She can rip him apart et al, but has questioned or sort of alluded the foundation of her marriage with TA when she stormed out and when she mind-voiced.

Through many a crisis, TA always stood by her and emphasized the need/importance of her education [example her bday celebration]. Knowing TA as well as she does, what is the need for her to call into question her "marriage"@ superficial level or to term it a distraction repeatedly?? Through her MM ordeal, she never questioned her relationship with her father??

Till now T has not analyzed why TA is behaving in a moronic way, nor she seems to be in a mood give TA the same leeway or accord the benefit of doubt that she had afforded MM & et al, as the "thaw and deep freeze of the winter chill" has set in in their relationship albeit temp, hence the question.