Why only Namish was sidelined for a Certain Criminal record breaker? - Page 6

Originally posted by: tejahaifeka

Thank you members for agreeing with me to some extent.

Regarding what Teja was promised or not. I don think anyone here has seen her contract so they can claim that she was promised a positive character.

Though I have never seen a contract given to TV stars. I do not think the contract has the word Positive Character or Negative Character. It is just mentions what their role would consist of, their working hrs, holidays, renumeration etc.

If the contract had the word positive character. Teja could have sued and gotten crores of Rs from RS n PH for violating the contract.

All she had to do was to go to court. And Teja being an Engg, I would assume has the basic knowledge of how things work. So she would know what to do if her contract was breached.

If not court, she could have gone to the various employee redressal forums available to help actors cheated by PH etc.

Since she did not take that route. I don think she was promised in the contract a postie role. Plus, contracts at least the starting ones are given on a yearly basis. So it cannot be that during renewal the terms were changed.

Infact I feel Ragini was always supposed to be a negative character.

Because I remember when SR had started. After a few days they used to give a montage of Swaragini where Swara in a Rikshaw was facing the audience while Ragini's rickshaw was going in the opposite direction. That was a big indicator that Ragini will soon be turning negative.

Montages always tell which way the story will go. The reasoning for my above logic is the montage of serial Kassam Se. That had 3 butterflies with the sec butterfly taking a path opposite to the other two. She took the tedha rasta. And the Sec sistet Piya in that serial was a negative charater. In the movie Dewaar. Sashi Kapoors character walks the straight path while Amitabh character took the tedha path and again as we know Amitabh was the Protagonist would had negative shades.

Originally posted by: Divine-Pearl

There's something called script narration

No one can write entire story in a contract

When they informed her about it, turning negative out of blue was not narrated. It's as simple as that.

There's is a show kuchh rang pyaar ke aise bhi, where a vertile actress like supriya ji openly said she's disappointed the way story is going, specially her character has been butchered, but still continued to play the same character becoz of contract.

If montage can narrate the entire story, there's a show from same production house 'sasural simar ka', could you find bhoot pret aatma chudail in first montage of the show?

I wonder if the actor playing mom in Kuch threatened to quit the show multiple times!

I never said montages tell the entire story. They show the way the story will go. They always have. In swaragini it has.

As I said before had someone not demanded for overnight greatness, Ragini and Ragya would have gotten a story as good n sweet as swasan. They were denied this just to show a murderer develop concious overnight and change sweet Lucky from careful guy to a person who rapes a women to get property. For more on this plz read my sec post.

Let me tell some delusional fool why Namii stands for tejaswi

1. He knows the basic etiquettes of being human.

2. Not just her he stands for everyone but never saw her doing the same, feel free to enlighten me if you have.

3. He is such a respectable and down to earth person that he doesn't know he got snakes around him.

4. TPW must have tied Namii rakhi as she is his elder sister. So like all responsibl younger brothers, Nami is comes forward to protect his vadi didi.

I think I made my points clear.

THANK YOU

Originally posted by: tejahaifeka

People who have KZK and Kyuki will tell how wonderfully Ronit Roy played the characters of Rishab Bajaj and Mihir Virani.

Rishab Bajaj was an out right villan when he came into KZK. But he was so good that people, including myself, fell in love with the character of Bajaj. He became so popular, that he was given a good redemption and he finally became the protagonist. While Anurag was d the protagonist by name, Rishab Bajaj got more imp, ss and story. His persona overshadowed PrernaAnurag's love story. The actor playing Anurag, which was also very popular left the show as he felt he was being overshadowed. And after entering as a villan in KZK, Ronit Roy came as the very popular and completely positive Minor Virani. People loved him in that rile too. In fact,at one point he was the positive protagonist in kyuki and negative protagonist in KZK.

This film and there are many other films and serials were the protagonist has been a person with grey shades or down right negative. And such ppl have been very popular and have had or are having good careers. So all that talk about losing out good rules is just nonsense. The mark of a good actor is to play any role that you get with conviction. If you do so, the audience will accept you no matter what you played earlier.

So I feel it was Teja's own insecurity with her skills that lead her to the foolish n questionable reasoning that she will not get good roles. I think she became jealous of the popularity SwaSan was getting. And since Ragya were still not a couple, she demanded to be made positive overnight so that they give Ragya a love story and she also becomes as popular and loved and Varun and Helli.

However, I feel she should not have demanded overnight change for Ragini. She should have waited with the flow. See how Suraj of Udaan who was negative is now fast becoming the male protagonist. I don think the actor threw tantrums to made positive n this is getting a good redemption track.

Teja in her demands to be made positive actually jeopardised Namiah's career. Since he was paired with her, he unwittingly bore the brunt of her demands n tantrums. They gave Ragya bakwas and stupid sequences with Lucky being a complete fool just to glorify Ragini.

I really feel sad for Namish. He without any mistake of his own got punished in the form of being sidelined and made a fool of a character just to fulfil someone's obsession with screen space. Ragini got increased ss because Lucky's SS was cut. There was no other way to do it. Namish n Lucky are actually paying very dearly for all the tantrums and politics that someone is doing in the sets of SR.

Originally posted by: tiny15

i'd heard that tejaswi herself ha d said in one of her IV that she was told that her ckt will b grey shaded.so its not abt contract and all or just narration of the story.

bcoz they know how contracts r done.and wenever any actor signs the show he/she knew that all depends on TRPs.

basically the show was abt swara & ragz parents & how they unite them & how their life wud'd been but ppl started liking LS of swasan & oders so it got changed. so i think sachinji & parineeta shud complained a lot that they r sidelined or not given enough SS or their own tracks.i m not saying she shudn't demand abt +ve ckt but theres a way of doing things. her insecurity & haste not just ruined ragz ckt even after bcuming +ve but alos ruined oder ckts i/c laksh,shomi,shekhar,pari.adarsh & the show.

any1 rembrs Qyamat by ekta neev was lead & his LS wid prachi was going on then milind's ckt was introduced was grey shaded just like rags initially w/o obsession but he mrd prachi fraudently.

but later on ppl started liking him so much & his pairing wid prachi that ekta din't get him mrd 2 his ex gf ayesha & prachi back 2 neev.and jay bhanushali playing neev got sidelined.

so actors shud ready 4 this. either u play it & don't crib or u shud quit firmly.i'd seen such things where actors were/r not satisfied wid their ckt portrayal etc but they either quit gracefully or remained in the show w/o any cribbing. no bad mouthing 2 PH or their co-stars.i won't give e.g as it"ll b 2 long.

Originally posted by: my-true-love

Though i dont agree to the statement namish is d obly one who can act.. as evn a kid can see namish cant act

I do agree with ur username 🤣

Originally posted by: Divine-Pearl

Umm

Actor playing Anurag left the show becoz he didnt want to play grand pa of kids in their 20s + he was not getting along with leading lady. Which insecurity arise inside him after 40 years leap?

Apple and orange both are fruits, but still they are different. Tejaswi and Ronit both are actors, but different individuals. Their priorities and working condition can never be the same.

Whatever I have read about suraj, chakri and udaan. Surat the hero made one sister pregnant and got married with another sister. What kind of redemption did they give him to glorify his lust?

Originally posted by: tejahaifeka

People are talking about trps here, what a joke!!!
That women was always supposed to be negative but whom am i even replying to, some ppl comes to forum just to get some fun from threads their heart desires who don't even have knowledge what goes on the show

I wonder if the actor playing mom in Kuch threatened to quit the show multiple times!

I never said montages tell the entire story. They show the way the story will go. They always have. In swaragini it has.

As I said before had someone not demanded for overnight greatness, Ragini and Ragya would have gotten a story as good n sweet as swasan. They were denied this just to show a murderer develop concious overnight and change sweet Lucky from careful guy to a person who rapes a women to get property. For more on this plz read my sec post.