Hats of Sanskar maheshwari - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

51

Views

5.6k

Users

19

Likes

188

Frequent Posters

Acumen thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#41

Originally posted by: luvakanksha

I don't think ragini said it bit in that sitar guitar segment of swaragini, ragini was not wearing sindoor n her giant mangalsutra was missing too 😆

Swara toh swara hai when it comes to ragini she thinks about no one else, I mean did u remember how she forced lakshay to accept her, how she wanted not to reveal her truth in front of the mm vaasis 😆
But if ragini moves on from lakshay the very foundation of her character (that she loves lakshay immensely and he iss her first priority) is ruined.

Oh the new looks after the 6 months leap in which they are looking even younger😆
Ragini moving on from Laksh will actually leave the past 1 & a half year's story of no use but i feel this time Ragini needs to be ignorant towards Laksh. Enough of proving her love for him, same for Sanskar (for his wife) too. Swara..i fail to understand her & i remember that after Ragini's truth was out how she still wanted every one to accept her especially Laksh.
Swara has apparently been selfish regarding her ma-baba & sister which is a big fault on her side. Shomi too!
Well, Swasan's track is crystal clear whereas RagLak's is confusing. But then we shouldn't expect logic from SR makers.
Edited by Acumen - 8 years ago
Diramylove thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#42
If ragini moving on from laksh...being ignorant...not wearinf sindoor is equal to her character butchering then yes I want this sort of character butchering.
Laksh has taken her for granted...she better not again run into his arms
luvakanksha thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#43

Originally posted by: temishfan

If ragini moving on from laksh...being ignorant...not wearinf sindoor is equal to her character butchering then yes I want this sort of character butchering.

Laksh has taken her for granted...she better not again run into his arms

It's not character butchering, but yeah I just want the reason behind it to be logical. Like swara is just being the sacrificial queen for ragini which she has always been. But Ragini not wearing sindoor n her giant mangalsutra should be backed up with a proper reason
@bold yeah I want that lakshay takes ragini for granted because she is easy for him, she has no self respect when ot comes to him. So I want her to give a tough time to him this time, it would be called growth of her character not butchering.
Acumen thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#44

Originally posted by: temishfan

If ragini moving on from laksh...being ignorant...not wearinf sindoor is equal to her character butchering then yes I want this sort of character butchering.

Laksh has taken her for granted...she better not again run into his arms

It won't be butchering of Ragini's character if she does so. Ragini has always proved her love for Laksh now its Laksh's turn. There is a scope for an amazing RagLak track but then makers are popular for ruining RagLak tracks. This time the cvs better not ditch the viewers.
Diramylove thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#45

Originally posted by: luvakanksha

It's not character butchering, but yeah I just want the reason behind it to be logical. Like swara is just being the sacrificial queen for ragini which she has always been. But Ragini not wearing sindoor n her giant mangalsutra should be backed up with a proper reason
@bold yeah I want that lakshay takes ragini for granted because she is easy for him, she has no self respect when ot comes to him. So I want her to give a tough time to him this time, it would be called growth of her character not butchering.


Husband has left her withoit talking once...if he doesn't care about the marriage then why should she by wearing sindoor and all..
I am not surprised seeing ragini not wearing...let laksh for once try to do something for this marriage
Acumen thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: luvakanksha

It's not character butchering, but yeah I just want the reason behind it to be logical. Like swara is just being the sacrificial queen for ragini which she has always been. But Ragini not wearing sindoor n her giant mangalsutra should be backed up with a proper reason
@bold yeah I want that lakshay takes ragini for granted because she is easy for him, she has no self respect when ot comes to him. So I want her to give a tough time to him this time, it would be called growth of her character not butchering.

I certainly agree!
Ragini's character overcoming Laksh will eventually lead to the growth of her character.
harshisajan thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#47

Originally posted by: tejunami

Wen ragini push swara into river that was crime and I agree it's crime till today ragini s not forgiven by many swaragini fans for that and Wat sanskaar did today s out of frustration and not preplanned ...I agree it was preplanned but if family members arrived late sanskaar would have killed laksh and laksh on other hand saved this guy from death the other day...If this s the case no meaning in brotherhood from sanskaar side as he always says to laksh am u r elder brother. ...does elder brother kills you out of frustration? ? What a kind of brother sanskaar is? Ragini pushing swara resulted for many to not accept swaragini as sisters likewise today sanlak too can't be accepted as brother's from here on...

👍🏼
AWESM_GAL thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#48

Originally posted by: Acumen

Sorry!.. offtopic:

1 thing i fail to understand is if Ragini's husband is missing then why behana won't apply sindoor?😕
Heights of stupidity

Seriously heights of stupidity...
If ragini's husband is missing only den y won't ragini apply sindoor...its for husband's long life n his existence...
Den to ragini shuf apply in more positive manner...is he dead or smthing like ragini assuming him to be dead...heights of stupidity...😆
Acumen thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#49

Originally posted by: anjum_s

Seriously heights of stupidity...
If ragini's husband is missing only den y won't ragini apply sindoor...its for husband's long life n his existence...
Den to ragini shuf apply in more positive manner...is he dead or smthing like ragini assuming him to be dead...heights of stupidity...😆

Ragini's decision to not to apply sindoor isn't out yet. I actually want to know the reason but then cvs will give something illogical similar to that of swara.
soumi93 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#50

Originally posted by: Acumen

Yeh behanchaara viewers ki jaan lelega🤢


Sach me yaar hum swaragini he
hamare sur mil jaye to Taal ke movie songs pe nachenge saath me🤣

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".