Originally posted by: deepikagupta9
I m very upset with forum people
why every person want swara to fall lucky, bcoz lucky had fallen for swara. till date swara had not shown any kind if romantic attraction toward lucky & I don't see her falling for lucky anytime in future also. in real life also we don't get things acc to our wish. If a couple have everything similar that doesn't mean they should be in luv. I know a couple who r more or less like swarya only but they r very close 2 each even we mistaken their relation as luv but they were not in luv & both r happily married to their respective partners but their frndship today also.swara will not slap laksh for his confession but for playing with ragini' s feelings..
Actually in modern times, in cities, in the society laksh and swara grew up in, people actually do get what they want. It may not be the first person they want or love but they definitely do have the option to marry people who they like. Swara doesn't need to fall for laksh but that doesn't mean he should marry Ragini. And most people, I am married so take my word for it, marry people they have COMMONALITIES with. Some city girl will not look in villages to find her partner because he will be her opposite. Doctors marry other doctors and not beggars because they're supposed opposites. People choose to be with people who have a similar lifestyle and rehen sehen. If a guy is an extrovert then rarely will he go looking for an introvert. Being similar in clothing and lifestyle and interests and outlook does not, in any way, imply that they don't have their fair share of differences. Laksh and swara aren't really as similar as everyone keeps on saying they are! Neither are they so different that they'd have to completely change their lifestyles to be with each other. Just because you know one couple who were similar and seemed like a couple but werent, doesn't mean that there aren't atleast 500 other couples who were close friends first. I think this forum is too affected by the Hindi serial definition of opposites. having opposite qualities doesn't mean having no commonality.