Rangabhoomi

Yesterday episode was another height of creativity by one and only Sid Tiwary... 😛

So much detailing on Astras and sastras... 😃

Ajj tak Maine Arjun ka sammohan Astra sune,pashupat Astra sune,anjalika Astra sune,different types of brahamastra sune 😛 ...But what is bhayastra!!!!

And karna Arjun is aiming brahamastra towards each other in rangabhoomi?? ist of all as per my knowledge both karna and Arjun had no knowledge of brahamastra during rangabhoomi competition...and 2nd brahamastra was an magical formula(many said its nuclear weapon )which caused imanse damage to the nature... That was the reason there were several restrictions to use it...Specially on mortals..one of them was that it can not be used for any competition or single combat...it was only could be used in war..but here karna-Arjun very much using it in rangabhoomi!!!! 🤪 accha hain kash yeh dono rangabhoomi Mein hi brahamastra use kaar lete...dono ke saath saath rangabhoomi bhi ud jatey...na rehte bansh na bajte bansuri... 😉 😆

I accidently happened to watch today's repeat telecast. Was that really Karna's portrayal I saw? When did Karna cared so much about his Kavacha? That appeard to me like a second statndard boy screaming at his friend "see my pencil, I have the best one, not the one like yours which reduces in length after sharpening every time". Karna used to boast about his abilities but never stooped too low like what is being shown in this stupid show. This has become a comedy circus now. And people who have not read real Mahabharata would believe all this is true. Just like how a fake Vrishali is real today, all stupidities shown in this show will be accepted as truth one day. Poor Karna; unfortunate even 5000 years after his death! I don't know whether to feel sad or laugh seeing this show. Gautam Rode would have looked the best as Krishna, not Karna! I want to use that Bhayastra on SidT uncle!!!! 😈

I have others questions too...

1. Where is kripacharya...everybody have forgot that poor man.. 😭

2.why SidT is so much hursh on ashu bhai???he too was a good worrier and a true loyal friend of ka-du...many time in the original epic he criticise ka-du for their misdeed on their face and tried to amend them...he saved karna in kurukshetra when ist time Arjun attacked him from behind without any intimation..like karna he too supported dury till the end...yes he did a tremendous sin at the end of kurukshetra war...but that too was an outburst of his anger...Till then pandavas killed his father and two beloved friends with treachery ...but he got his punishment too...the question he asked to lord Krishna was not at all illogical...then what is the reason to show him so negative in atleast story of karna???in mahabharat pandavas were protagonists then he was obviously antagonist...but in karna's story he was loyal friend...other than durydhan he too was an higher caste person who befriend with lower cast karna.

3.when yudisthir critisise bheem for absuing karna in rangabhoomi...what is th need of the pure white character of the epic to do so much whitewash???makers should keep in mind that too much white is very difficult to maintain.. 😉

4.when Arjun accepted the challenge of karna so rapidly in rangabhoomi?????

5.is their no other actress to play the role of kunti in whole tellywood industry...i mean I do not bother about that particular character and it's performance...but as in karna's story she is one of the important character and and makers should be choosy to select an good actor for her role.

6.Goutam Rode is no doubt an good actor and very handsome too...but he is really a very bad choice as karna...his physical structure and appearance does not matched with the character like karna...I am extremely sorry if my comments hurt anybody..

Just caught up with the epi..

They can never show Lord Krishna as antagonist, thousands people's feeling and devotion towards him.. He is God himself, Sid.T can nvr show him as antagonist.
regarding Arjun, Sid.T has special love for Kunti and pandavas, if needed he will glorify them bt nvr show them in bad light.. keep watching he will only show Duryodhan and camp in bad light. and yes Sid.T dislike only one character ;) keep watching

Originally posted by: Nandita_Siddian

I have others questions too...

1. Where is kripacharya...everybody have forgot that poor man.. 😭

2.why SidT is so much hursh on ashu bhai???he too was a good worrier and a true loyal friend of ka-du...many time in the original epic he criticise ka-du for their misdeed on their face and tried to amend them...he saved karna in kurukshetra when ist time Arjun attacked him from behind without any intimation..like karna he too supported dury till the end...yes he did a tremendous sin at the end of kurukshetra war...but that too was an outburst of his anger...Till then pandavas killed his father and two beloved friends with treachery ...but he got his punishment too...the question he asked to lord Krishna was not at all illogical...then what is the reason to show him so negative in atleast story of karna???in mahabharat pandavas were protagonists then he was obviously antagonist...but in karna's story he was loyal friend...other than durydhan he too was an higher caste person who befriend with lower cast karna.

3.when yudisthir critisise bheem for absuing karna in rangabhoomi...what is th need of the pure white character of the epic to do so much whitewash???makers should keep in mind that too much white is very difficult to maintain.. 😉

4.when Arjun accepted the challenge of karna so rapidly in rangabhoomi?????

5.is their no other actress to play the role of kunti in whole tellywood industry...i mean I do not bother about that particular character and it's performance...but as in karna's story she is one of the important character and and makers should be choosy to select an good actor for her role.

6.Goutam Rode is no doubt an good actor and very handsome too...but he is really a very bad choice as karna...his physical structure and appearance does not matched with the character like karna...I am extremely sorry if my comments hurt anybody..

Sid T has special love for Yudhisthir 😆 the way he white washed him during vastraharan and dice game in SP ws 🤢 lets see wht he does in SPK..

I am sure SidT will not show kunti and pandavas specially arjun or lord Krishna in bad light..so pandavas fans do not need to becum scared.. 😊

And SidT's most fav subject is kaju...and I an waiting for that too... 😆


But I am scared for kuru camp.. ...do not know why Gautam is giving all the dialogue delivery so loud!!!!and not only that why he is roaming all around the set to deliver a single sequence???? it's very bad in taste..he is looking like a impatience teenager...history says karn was very mature and patience guy...he spoke up very less...but when he spoke he just burnt others...and this others were only those persons whom he considered as his enemy or whom insulted him ist...bheeshma pitamah also said that he was a refuge to his friends and relatives or to them who loved and respected him...here karna is soo disrespectful towards drona and vidur... ...and my god he is talking to dhritrastra so arrogantly...karna-dhritrastra relation is always a perfect relation of a management and his most efficient and reliable employee.. 😆 dhritrastra too believed on karna even more than his own sons...it was not only dury but also dhritrastra also wanted karna in their gang at any cost...there are some conversation among kauravas..where karna was opposing dury and dhritrastra is supporting karna against dury...thus shows how much he trusted karna. .and karna was equally respectful towards dhritrastra throughout his life...death of karna not only broke dury but also dhritrastra too..

Shaleen as dury is little bit better ...but still he is also very loud...

I have no word for shakuni...here he is just a joker...I think sidT have no idea How to portray a negative character with grace...a person is negative that means not he can not be graceful..

Ashu bhai ke saath tho isska pichle janam ka dusmani hain... 🥱 so I am not expecting anything from him atleast for ashu bhai.. 🤢

Dusshy ka haal bhi same hain as sakuni and ashu bhai.. 🤢

Over all the whole show is just flying over my head..i can not understand what SidT exactly wanted to show???I know SidT loves karna very much...but I have doubt that how much he understand the depth of the character Karna????karna is an antagonist whose ideology,behaviour and presence effected our mind ...some ppl love him...some ppl hate him...but no reader can ignore this character...

Remember we are seeing this story through karn's perspective. I believe this is why we are seeing arjun and pandavs in a more antagonist view and duryodhan as more of a protagonist.

I am not talking about antagonist or protagonists...every coin have two opposite side and everybody should have right to explain his pov...if we consider Mb is an historical event then it is really very much needed to know tha pov of kauravas too...ved vayas have written Jaya on that incident which was totally from the winner's pov...he thought pandavas were right so he justified his and their pov...and no harm in that..a writer should have the right to justify his own pov..similarly if any writer or maker wanted to justify the Pov of vanquished then also it is not a crime...a clan was defeated in a war that means not they were only wrong...they did not had any good qualities...they did not is loved or respected anybody...all their relation was selfish...there are many evidance in India which shows that kauravas were not that much negative how they are depicted in Jaya or even the later editions of Mb or tv shows and plays...there are many incidents even written in Mb which shows that dury was not that much evil..even ved vayas himself admitted many good qualities of karna...he never said that karna-dury friendship was fake...he always said that dury loved and trusted karna from the core of his heart...
I just want if SidT really wanted to justify karna's pov...then show it properly...if he will do proper reserch he easilly can get many evidence to justify karna and his pov...there is no need to make someone antagonists or protagonists...