{| SPK: Episode Discussion thread #1 |} - Page 61

the scene btn ka -drou was not needed instead of tht .thy show same friendship scene btn karn and banumathi it may be more fitting than this white washings and unnecessary glorification s ...
it also shows the tiny details like Bhanu asking reg dury befr swayamvar and feel a nice bond about karn .and his respect to her as future friend wife ..it may suits well in imaginary way ..but makers are hell bent on mockries ...

Originally posted by: Mahiima16

Pankhuri isn't ugly Infact she's better than vrishali,Kunti.

Pankhuri is very pretty dear...she looks very innocent.
Unfortunately she gets roles that should look proud and strong...But she looks too serene...
I dont know about her acting...so let's see...

The actress playing Kunti is very pretty...but they have deliberately made her look old bcoz of the character.
And the actress playing Vrushali...well I have seen her in Veera...though she is pretty, I find her attitude very irritating(no offence to anyone).

I like Karna-Vrushali's pairing and imagine Karna's first wife as a very dignified soul...even if she wasnt.
In my imagination she is a firm, dignified woman...maybe thats y I kind of liked Mukut-hater minus the Mukut-hatred... 😆 but this Vrushali is nowhere close to that...

I loved the kid Vrushali...She was so cute... 😳

Originally posted by: amritat

Pankhuri is very pretty dear...she looks very innocent.
Unfortunately she gets roles that should look proud and strong...But she looks too serene...
I dont know about her acting...so let's see...

The actress playing Kunti is very pretty...but they have deliberately made her look old bcoz of the character.
And the actress playing Vrushali...well I have seen her in Veera...though she is pretty, I find her attitude very irritating(no offence to anyone).

I like Karna-Vrushali's pairing and imagine Karna's first wife as a very dignified soul...even if she wasnt.
In my imagination she is a firm, dignified woman...maybe thats y I kind of liked Mukut-hater minus the Mukut-hatred... 😆 but this Vrushali is nowhere close to that...

I loved the kid Vrushali...She was so cute... 😳

Yes Pankhuri looks really very innconent and kunti and vrishali are also very pretty but I just wanted to say that according to me Pankhuri is the best actress in this show. 😛

Originally posted by: vinnas

the scene btn ka -drou was not needed instead of tht .thy show same friendship scene btn karn and banumathi it may be more fitting than this white washings and unnecessary glorification s ...
it also shows the tiny details like Bhanu asking reg dury befr swayamvar and feel a nice bond about karn .and his respect to her as future friend wife ..it may suits well in imaginary way ..but makers are hell bent on mockries ...

👍🏼

Originally posted by: Mahiima16

Yes Pankhuri looks really very innconent and kunti and vrishali are also very pretty but I just wanted to say that according to me Pankhuri is the best actress in this show. 😛

I agree...Pankhuri is one of the best choices so far...
The worst choice is undoubtedly Shakuni followed close by Karna...
Gautam Rode is good-looking and decent actor but he doesnt look like Karna...
I am so missing Aham Sharma...that man was 😳

Yes Aham was too good as karna 😳 Gautam is a wonderful actor but he is not apt for karna he would have looked good as Lord Krishna.

karna draupadi angle? kya ho rahaa hain show mein? i haven't seen the epi, but, judging by the comments it, sid t and utkarsh naithani is turning the show into a karna fan novel.

Originally posted by: Arijit007

karna draupadi angle? kya ho rahaa hain show mein? i haven't seen the epi, but, judging by the comments it, sid t and utkarsh naithani is turning the show into a karna fan novel.

Yes it's their own fictional story about karna.The characters are from mahabharat only but the story of mahabharat is changed 😕

Pankhuri is not ugly yaar...she is very beautiful...she is looking like a little doll...but thing is that pooja was very impressive as draupadi...she looked like flawless pandava maharani in the Mb... 😳

Originally posted by: vinnas

the scene btn ka -drou was not needed instead of tht .thy show same friendship scene btn karn and banumathi it may be more fitting than this white washings and unnecessary glorification s ...
it also shows the tiny details like Bhanu asking reg dury befr swayamvar and feel a nice bond about karn .and his respect to her as future friend wife ..it may suits well in imaginary way ..but makers are hell bent on mockries ...

You have just said my mind...me too think that ke if they wanted to focus's on karna and his relationship and want to fictionalise it then they should focus on atleast the the facts...karna - radha relationship can be shown as kalrishna -yasoda(even many ppl consider it)..but no makers are more interested on karna- kunti...

Similarly there are so many relationship about karna...karna -vrishali,karna-Supriya,karna Bhanumati,karna-duryadhana,karna-aswathhama etc to show his positive sides as a lover,husband,friends...becoz he too was considered as a refuge to his friends and family...thre were many other relationship like karna-dhritrastra to show his loyalty ...karna-adhirath...but here makers have totally destroyed that portion...

Nobody want that makers should evicted pandavas,draupadi ,kunti from Karna's show...they were awesome at their pov...show their stories from their angel...no need to blackwash them...but atleast show the fact that they too were not respectful towards him...i do not think that will blackwash them...becoz it was fact they were enemy and karna is known for his extreme enmity too...

Was ramdhari Singh needed to blackwash pandavas,kunti,drau,Krishna to show his agenda on karna???? Was shivaji sawant needed it???? Was Rabindranath Tagore needed it????the answer is no...no famous novel/poems on karna till now shown pandavas or kunti or drau or Krishna as evil...but the writers were successful to hit the eye ball...and ppl whole heartedly accepted that...and if sidT needed to change the fact...that means he have some loopwholes in his understanding of the characters...