{| SPK: Episode Discussion thread #1 |} - Page 111

Amrita, in which version of mahabharat is Vastraharan is not present ? 😆 Are u saying so coz u wish to see a happy ending MB ??😆 In that sense, count me in! 😆

Originally posted by: ---Anu---

Amrita, in which version of mahabharat is Vastraharan is not present ? 😆Are u saying so coz u wish to see a happy ending MB ??😆In that sense, count me in!😆

There is no version without VH. But scholars who have studied Mahbharata in detail have found numerous evidences in the book itself proving VH did not happen at all.😃

Originally posted by: Brahmaputra

Well, I wish the CVs let Karna enjoy his first night or sent him for honeymoon. Poor guy is doing "Pandava bachao aandolan" since he got married. If not done fast, things will be upside down soon. Because I heard the other day that Sony Krishna was humming right in front of Sony Dury...
"yeh mera kaajal, haan mera kaajal
Karna ko yeh kar dega paagal..."

you are giving me panic attacks.

Originally posted by: Brahmaputra

Well, I wish the CVs let Karna enjoy his first night or sent him for honeymoon. Poor guy is doing "Pandava bachao aandolan" since he got married. If not done fast, things will be upside down soon. Because I heard the other day that Sony Krishna was humming right in front of Sony Dury...
"yeh mera kaajal, haan mera kaajal
Karna ko yeh kar dega paagal..."

🤣 I think I should be given an award for watching this crap. But it is good for a laugh. Sony krishna's attempts at seducing sony karna into an EMA is looking really 🤣

Originally posted by: amritat

They had portrayed Draupadi quite positively in the initial days...

I just hope they dont ruin that...

They should show her flaws only as much as it is mentioned in the epic...not an atom more.

Anyway...y are they giving so much importance to the Pandavas n Draupadi in Karna's show?

Why cant they show Vrushali, Supriya n all...n just leave Draupadi alone!!

I am sure people who love Karna had expected to see more about Karna n his personal life...instead of Mahabharat Part 2...

Which of these CVs have read the epic? They are just making up things from their heads which need urgent examination. 🤢

Originally posted by: Brahmaputra

There is no version without VH. But scholars who have studied Mahbharata in detail have found numerous evidences in the book itself proving VH did not happen at all.😃

Originally posted by: Arijit007

you are giving me panic attacks.

But that is less than what SPK could offer.

Originally posted by: ---Anu---

😲So what was their conclusion about the entire MB ?? Surely, VH was one of the major reasons for the war. Forgive me for my lack of knowledge..I m still into the readings. All I ever read of MB previously was of Rajagopalachari, based on Vyasa.

They have concluded nothing. See, there were two rounds of DS. VH is said to have happened in first round. After that, Dhrit uncle set Ps free on Draupadi's request and returned them all their wealth. Then comes the second round because of which they lost everything again to Dury and they had to go for Vanavas. So Draupadi's insult did not matter to them anymore as the issue was already over and they were returned their wealth after first round. Moreover, all Pandavas before going Vanavasa took vows to kill Ks if the would not return IP. No one said a word about Draupadi's insult. They did not care at all when she was getting dragged by hair!!! Then what would they have cared after 13 years of it???
The true motive behind the war was land which is repeatedly mentioned, not Draupadi's insult. But fighting for land will make Ps Villains as their intentions are clear when they took part in second round DS - they needed HP also. So how can the winners be called "adharmis"??? Moreover, all major warriors on Kaurava side were killed through cheating, not in a fair way. They had to cover up all these, right? After all, winners write history. So they made poor Draupadi a scapegoat again. No one cared for her when she was alive. So what would they after she died??? Pandavas simply covered up their greed for land using Draupadi's insult. They repeatedly said they wanted war if they would not be returned the kingdom!!! By doing this, they made Draupadi look like a bloodthirsty witch. Many things are interpolations here - VH, Dury asking Draupadi to sit on his thighs, Karna calling her bandhaki and ordering her stripping etc because Draupadi herself never recalls these incidents when she talks about DS in parvas after Sabha Parva. Neither does Yudhi, nor Krishna. These insults are not too easy to forget. All she mentions is only getting dragged by hair.

Originally posted by: Brahmaputra

But that is less than what SPK could offer.

yes, they would give me heart attack and brain hammerage.

Seems like my post has instilled curiosity in many people regarding Vastraharan...😆