Please Close this Topic! - Page 15

@Adishakti - I think you have wrongly mentioned some points in your previous post which led to all confusion.

Originally posted by: Adishakti

Really do you think at 3 years old Duryodhan was capable of mixing poison in Bhimasena food and drowning him in Pramanakoti.[BR][DIV]Bhima and Duryodhan were born a day after each other the exact timeline is not mentioned of Pandu's death, but most people make an assumption that Yudhishtir was 16 when they arrived back in HP based on his birth star and the stars present at the time of Mahabharata war. So bhima and Duryodhan must be 15 then[/DIV]

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark

Riti

Even if she wasn't a minor, I am totally sure she did that by mistake.. and that she was minor is what I have known until now.. I don't mind being disproved.. Just would like to know if there is any clear mention of her age then...

And about going to Karna. Ofcourse she wanted her sons to be King but what I try to point out is even if she wanted to morally weaken him (I read some citation of her telling it to Keshav I think..) Then also I don't feel she wanted any bad of Karna.. I try to say that she loved Karna too... If we see clearly, if Karna would accept her offer, then the plan of demoralizing would not work right..Maybe Kunti knew that too? And also for a fact, demoralizing him would only not let him fight with all his mind for the wrong side.. if we see the moral part of it... (Did not want to mention this but just saying on a side note.😊)

Originally posted by: riti4u

@Adishakti - I think you have wrongly mentioned some points in your previous post which led to all confusion.

On Page 15 , you mentioned this

"And as soon as Pandavas arrived in HP after Pandu's death, duryodhan openly decried the ptaternity of her children that Pandavas are not sons of gods."

and Now you mentioning that duryodhana says this in Udhyog Parva. So this has caused confusion that Diala was pointing out.

@Brishti- Guesses and interpretations of actions are subjective to our own view of the characters.. 😊 So we can agree to disagree on what Kunti intentions might have been😊..I understood your points though..

I am thinking of renaming this thread🤔

Originally posted by: Crazypheonix008

The only thing Kunti can be truly blamed for is going to Karna and asking him to join the Pandavas, it was unjust not just to Karna but also to Pandavas and most importantly to Draupadi ( if he had accepted).

Having sex with a child who is not mature enough to understand its consequences even if the child wants it is statutory rape. so it is not wrong if one says Kunti was raped by whoever fathered Karna (Durvasa/ any other man with sun like splendor).