The deep dark underbelly of IPK forum...

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Cetronia

@Cetronia

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#11

A rule for one is rule for all right...DKS is asking a geneiune question and asking for judgement and we support his cause.

He is bound to have a explanation for closing down his thread and a apology too for this bias shown against him...

Quote

513248

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#12

Mandy, I'm sorry but it's time I directly address you. My friends complained sometime ago about you not being the proper Moderator that this ever-blooming Forum calls for. I had never noticed it myself and so had no right to put any blame on you.

But today I say it loud and clear [want me to shout like Arnav Wolfy Raizada?] that you don't deserve to be a Moderator. If you ever bothered to consider your responsibility, you would have found out that being biased is a worst trait a judge could have and it is a trait you are holding right now.

To a post questioning your prejudice, you replied with confirming your prejudice. Interesting.

Edited by -Aimz- - 13 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

madhu0702

@madhu0702

Navigator

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#13

I am not a member of IPK forum. So not familiar with the moderators there. But just went through your closed post. What the hell? Neither an explanation was given for the genuine question raised nor one for closing the topic?!😲 This is truly shocking. For godsake, we are not living under Hitler regime. What does she thinks of herself? She in no way deserves to be a moderator. A moderator should never be biased, no matter what. And here, heights of biasedness. I really hope people concerned will look into this issue and you will get justice👍🏼

Quote

Priyanka

@AmazingAmy

Dazzler

+ 6

Posted: 13 years ago

#14

Monu...I'm glad you posted in this section of the forum. I'm really annoyed that they closed your thread without any warning or explanations but went to the other thread (using the exact same language you used) to tell the members to edit their posts. So this is why they tell us to report posts? What's the point when there is so much bias.

The IPK forum should be moderated by people who don't watch the show...so that there is no bias against any actor/character/fan group...it would make things much more balanced and there would be less complaints. Its ridiculous how many people have brought up this issue yet it keeps getting overlooked. I've been a part of bigger forums that are run much better than this.

Edited by AyeReKhushi - 13 years ago

Quote

Akanksha-

@Akanksha-

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

#15

I agree with DKS. He should be answered and all of us too. What is wrong when he said what is happening in open? Its highly disgusting on part of that moderator who closed thread without prior notice. In first place, what is wrong in that post? Did anyone use derogatory words or abusive language? Did anyone attack actors or people directly?
A Khushi says, HAR HAQ KE SAATH ZIMMEDARIYAN BHI HOTE HAIN. IF you dont follow your responsibilities equally for all the forum people you dont have any right to close the topics. We have the right to question if something is going wrong. You people are in a respectful place in the forum and please behave according to it

Edited by sarunfan4ever - 13 years ago

Quote

Siri22

@Siri22

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

#16

Mandy,

When DKS pointed out the Redux thread,as a fair MOD you should have closed that thread too or open DKS thread that you closed.

Instead you asked your friends to edit their posts. Pray tell me why this special treatment for Redux threads?

I don't understand did any of them fall from the sky?

On behalf of DKS I'm demanding an explanation and an apology to the forum and to DKS from you.

Edited by Siri22 - 13 years ago

Quote

Rockerchic

@Rockerchic

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 13 years ago

#17

Definitely there is a lot of bias in the IPK forum.

It's fine following rules but it must be done to everyone.

It's not fair that only certain people's posts get closed time and time again even though they are good debate topics.

Quote

IamSwapnali

@IamSwapnali

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

#18

We definitely need Vijay's attention here.

Just as the members have WL's there has to be concept of performance review for the mods, if there are several incidences like this shouldn't there be some inquiry? There are proofs for this mod's biased treatment, so we need some action taken against it.

Also if a person is promoted to the position of a mod, he/ she needs to perform the duties of the MOD only. How can one act like a regular member in a forum making posts and the same person goes on closing other posts that do not match his/ her opinion?

Please admins, take this matter seriously. And, please review the profiles of banned members since this particular MOD has come into the picture.

Quote

791198

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: ILoveHussain
We definitely need Vijay's attention here.

Just as the members have WL's there has to be concept of performance review for the mods, if there are several incidences like this shouldn't there be some inquiry? There are proofs for this mod's biased treatment, so we need some action taken against it.

Also if a person is promoted to the position of a mod, he/ she needs to perform the duties of the MOD only. How can one act like a regular member in a forum making posts and the same person goes on closing other posts that do not match his/ her opinion?

Please admins, take this matter seriously. And, please review the profiles of banned members since this particular MOD has come into the picture.

Brilliant Idea. I don't know what has transpired on in the IPK forum for this to become an issue. But I agree with you guys. There should definitely be a monthly/quarterly review on moderators too. Or they tend to think they are gods and do as they please. Then things go haywire, members feel violated and threads like this are born. None of this would arise if moderators had someone above them watching them closely on a regular basis.