Comments in TB articles -UNFAIR- mods plzz read!!! - Page 4

i agree

I would suggest post this thread in FaceBook on India-Forums wall, or if you can message Vijay about it it can be expedited faster.

Accroding to me its highly biased and dissapointing , I have many things to do otehr than being on IF I may be just a few fans count for the celeb whom I write but I make an effort to do it atleast n number of times in the week , and also the TB article should have limited comments NOT more than 200. for every article. and should'nt be tagged to the celebrities if they allow more comments.

The rule shold be equl to all whether he/she is no 1 or no nth.

They should also remove MID's and each person should have only one account and genuine one , even age limit should be given to members like they do on FB or some validity needed.

I have been on IF for a while and this system is getting out of hand and there needs to be stop done , as a member or fan of a celebrity justice should be equal to all.

Well even if that is the case still makes no sense to allow 700 to 800 comments on articles.
Sorry to say but this seems irrational.
And the tagging of articles to teh celbrities profile for ranking should'nt be allowed.

If I am a Fan of a celebrity and the celebrity has a small Fan base we comment only twice and limited on the article then they should allow more comments from the individual or restrict it to 200 per article

And articles back to back on the same celebrity seems unreasonable also

I am quite dishartened by this gesture the IF management should then allow atleast 200 comments for other celebrities articles who have lower fan base and they can comment more number of times restricted to a count of 200.
and this should be across all celebrities and the ranking should be purely based on the profile comments. and if more than 20 comments are there per week that celebrity should have his arrow up and green the number can increase by one point by comment ratio bases.

I am just stating what I think makes things reasonable. No offence to anyone.

The ranking system is one big bogus racket and manipulative.
They only enjoy showing the same top 10 week after week,

Its an unfair system for people to take efforts and comment on profiles without any MID's or even with a Less fan base.

Only the handfull who are on top seem to enjoy while according to this ranking system the rest are sitting idle.

Very disheartening when we comment atleast 20 times a week the celebrities ranking should stay green with comments on the celebrity when the profile is kept quite active.

UNREASONABLE SYSTEM 👎🏼

Originally posted by: -Nadii-

Hey All

First of all I want to say same rule count for every celeb on IF, about commenting twice, trice and so on, on Barun Sobti's article I want to say its not possible at all.

I tried my self, and I cant comment twice. My last comment was made yesterday.

Hi Nadii, but it's possible. On the first day that Barun's article was released, my sister commented four times, and on the first day Gurmeet's article was released, I was able to comment thrice.

It's different each time, for every celebrity. Is this an error of the system?

there is no basis..if has partiality for gurmeet and some others first it was karn singh grover...soem articles r meaningless and too many just to keep those celebs in top position..i feel article should not be considered while ranking the actors...

hehe IF seems like IDK!!! One DD articles had this problem and now GC's!!! i TOO get this problem always and sometimes I am shocked ppl can even comment 3 times in a celebrity profile while I cant even comment twice!! 😡

Ok guys I need help...this GC article came on last sunday and the buzz counts until that day too but the comments are 900+ and still going on so did they count this in buzz as ppl are still commenting??? I heard 1000+ means 150 buzz point so how come GC got 45 buzz points?? Can anyone help me...I am confused!!😕