Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 21 Aug 2025 EDT
DASHI FUTTT 21.8
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 22 Aug 2025 EDT
Out Now - Official Preview - The Ba***ds Of Bollywood
Book talk reading challenge September 2025 ~ Sign up open!
Chal jhooti; Shaadi ka Har nhi Fansi ka zehrila Fanda (pics only)
Media in India: Democracy’s Watchdog or Power’s Megaphone?
Mann main koi aur, shaadi se kisi aur
THAKELA LOVE 22.8
August disaster. Will Param Sundari save BW this month?
Anupamaa 21 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Proud Parents SRK-Gauri Watch Aryan 🥰
Vivek Agnihotri Calls Maharashtrian food 'gareebon ka khana'
Vivek Agnihotri - Nobody Should Name Their Child Taimur
27 years of Dil Se
Danger - Param Sundari | Sidharth M, Janhvi K | SONG OUT
Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@aditi I loved your questions and I am happy you bought the fading hand prints part. Actually I dont think CVs mistake has been there today.
Thing is the drama that is to unfold and I feel this is the real twist of SKR or real Siya Ke Ram, a new perspective in itself. Hari's Maya cannot open to viewers. Because if they open it up mostly the undekha pehlu will go. They have kept that part guarded is what I feel. AP was not perception breaking.But Bhoomipravesh is perception breaking that is the difference you have to understand in both. I didnt wanted to put it in today's analysis but your question forced me to put it.For Ram it is very essential the perception is kept at all levels. So each dialogue we have to understand from above and its intend. From above he is behaving like a man rejoiced in seeing his wife and kids. We need to know the sainiks were there with Ram. They also have seen Sita. They also have understood who the kids is. News will spread will wildfire in Ayodhya Sita is in jungle, she has 2 boys, raghuvansh has heir to the throne. Sita needs to be back will come from praja and soon the royal family will also know of it. So should the family know from him first or from praja. From him right. And when he tells can he be sad and tell. Or like a normal human who sees his wife and kids safe after 12 years tell. he does the latter. They are all rejoicingSita yes she had only seen Ram. A man with no major responsibilities. At that time he was completely devoted to her. But the man who handles praja and her, his choices were different. If both has to happen he needed her support also. That is actually the growth for a girl from a girl to woman. To understand a man, his obligations when he becomes a son, a professional, brother along with being a husband. Many girls miss on this aspect when they are in love, when they only see their lovers face and not his other roles. When I have written the fiction Seven Vows I had clearly tried to bring the difference in Sreedhar and Sreedhar Varma. Sreedhar Suman's love, Sreedhar Varma along with her love, a son, a brother and belonging to a prominent family@divine ram he said Ram-Siya can never be seperated again. Centuries have gone by. Has anyone able to seperate Sita from Ram or Ram from Sita. No right. He didnt mean the physical union, he meant their union that transcends the physical and emotional realm to the spiritual realm. Yes everyone thinks that dialogue in the physical sense.
Originally posted by: avalonhigh1234
Shruthi , Iam writing this post from Sita's point of view... Sita never loved just only a single aspect of Ram. Her perceptions were varied even before she met him. His saving the horse's life, his compassion towards Ahalya and his killing of Taaraka all established his qualities as a warrior with a respect for life of every being and his infinite compassion for a woman whom society considered impure, collectively increased her interest in him. His love for her after their marriage and his respect for her as an individual reiterated her understanding of him. His conversations with her even during the first vanvass was open and without any hidden layers. This love of his gave her the strength to withstand the atrocities in Lanka with dignity and courage and to repel Ravan's torture with the unshakable conviction that Ram would come for her. Her belief in him was unshaken even when she decided to take the agni pareeksha .But in spite of that she was sent away in the middle of night .She understood a king's decision, but the emergence of secretiveness in their relationship would have caused her untold hurt... she has suffered the consequences of a king's decision but she has not been privy to a husband's pain or even his guilt, till she heard him. When she saw him after 12 years, she saw the king who had come to fight her sons and not her husband who didn't even acknowledge her sons...can we even understand the depth of anguish of a wife and mother? She understands her husband as much as he knows her. But if she is not able to look past her hurt ,Ram is also not able to break the shackles of kul and raj dharm .That is the beauty of Ram and Sita ,they both are bound by their human qualities of being not being perfect. How can we forget that Hari's maya is as incomplete without Prakriti's contribution as much as her manifestation is impossible without Hari's instigation of it?Savita