Originally posted by: Arijit007
brace yourself lakshman fans, kal starsita kaa muh khulne waalaa hain.
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 25th Sep 2025
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 25, 2025 EDT
ROOM SERVICE 25.9
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: PAK vs BD, Match 17, A2 vs B2 - Super 4 @Dubai🏏
Hawt Geetmaan Moments 🔥🔥💋💋
Sameer Wankhede takes Aryan Khan’s series TBOB to Court
Important Questions
Deepika to reunite with Vin Diesel for XXX 4?
DANDIYA NIGHT 26.9
Movies of Sonam Kapoor's which I enjoyed
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 26, 2025 EDT
Quiz for BB19 Members.
OTT vs. theatre: which one do you prefer?
How Salman Khan Would Address You in Weekend Ka Vaar? Quiz
Daayra shooting begins - Kareena and Prithviraj
Abhira master planner of breaking Arman relationships
Two Much With Kajol Twinkle Episode Reviews
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: IND vs SL, Match 18, A1 vs B1 - Super 4 @Dubai🏏
Originally posted by: Arijit007
brace yourself lakshman fans, kal starsita kaa muh khulne waalaa hain.
Originally posted by: Arijit007
so, mareech has been struck with the arrow, he cried for sita and lakshman in ram's voice. now, sita haran is stated for 30th may, in chaar dinon mein kya hogaa?
Aside from what others have noted here, a few glaring things stood out in the episodes from this week, particularly yesterday
First of all, Ravan never brought Sita to Lanka to make her her dasi, as this serial is portrayed as showing. Had he done that, he would have been less guilty of sinning than he really did. One can be a maid to another man w/o becoming his concubine - Tara - Harishchandra's wife did just that when she was sold by her husband to a Brahmin to help repay his 'debt' to the Vishy meister. If Ravan makes ⭐️Sita do jhadu-pocha in Lanka or fan Shurpi or Mando, that would not be anywhere near as inappropriate as what he tried to do - cajole Sita into marrying him.What they showed of Roma yesterday was pure defamation of the type Ayodhyavasis suspected about Sita - the CVs have to be genuine Roma haters. Roma was seized by Vali and sexually subjugated by him while she was under him. Here, they show Roma as declaring to Hanuman that Vali is her husband 🤢😡 Also, Vali never told Roma that if she marries him, that he'd forgive Sugreev. And even if he did, Roma could easily have accepted Hanuman's offer to be taken to Sugreev. In the original Ramayan, did Roma & Sugreev have any sons, like Vali & Tara had Angad?And as Harani pointed out, the vanaras didn't join Sugreev in droves, just a handful did. Also, there was no public outrage at what Vali had done, since the Vanaras were a more permissive society. When Vali disappeared, Tara voluntarily accepted Sugreev as her husband: she didn't don a widow's garb, but she did switch back to Vali when he returned. Vali did take umbrage at that and possessed Roma in retaliation. And Tara again took Sugreev as her husband after Vali's death.
^^The makers here then truly must hate the Vanar society in general to come up with crap such as this!
Inn chaar dino mein Lakshman ki waat lagegi aur kya! Why have they made such a huge error with Sita's character is beyond me? What are the makers trying to portray??