This is not the same SKR which we loved - Page 12

Originally posted by: Arijit007

shivam, as krishna said here, you are misplacing the name of the authors, neelkantan is the one who are blackpainting the divine charecters not devdutt.

nope, mujhe koi shauk nahi hain paagal hone kaa.

I agree

Originally posted by: raima18

I agree

Sita's outfit bothered me a lot. As if they finally decided enough of spending money on her clothes. But it feels like it's all done in one day.

Suguni track was unnecessary.

Lot of time wasted on manthra scenes and mandodari and Ravan.

Garbhadan forgotten.

Mandvi and Shrutikirti staying back looks wrong.

Also using one room to keep the arrow and making a big scene about the curse and all.

They need to stick to the original.

Shivam arjit anand completely butcher's the characters.

Originally posted by: jayvenk

Shivam arjit anand completely butcher's the characters.

He just writes the opposite of what we know, heard read etc.

By writing from duryodhan pov does not mean making duryodhan innocent. But that is what AN had done.

I read a few pages felt nauseated.

Asura from Ravan pov is better I heard. But don't think I will give it a try.

Krishna being gray in MB is widely accepted as it was for dharma.

Sometimes we have to look beyond to understand the actions taken.

Killing of valli from behind is another argument that comes up in Ramayana.

These are incidents that us better mortals have to understand not from just the surface but in depth.

@bold: This comes in Kambar Ramayan. I differ with this.
When Vali fights with Sugriva, Ram will be standing there and not hiding. But as per Kshatriya dharm, when two involves in yudh, third person should not take part, but Ram involved in the fight. Vali scolded Ram for breaking the Kshatriya dharm and so Ram told he will be the cause for his death in next birth(avatar).
I hope Tamil debate on Kambar Ramayan be stopped based on this wrong assumption. So many beautiful things are there in Kambar Ramayan, but I don't know why people often take this as topic. This is my POV and not against you Jai

ramya, hehe, as i mentioned the argument pops up many a times.

Originally posted by: jayvenk

ramya, hehe, as i mentioned the argument pops up many a times.

and even if u say something against, no problem da.

Arguments and discussions are always helpful in knowing more.

except that the arguments should not escalate into a fight 😃

Its true Jai. I saw one kambar kazhagan pattimandram (debate about the vali padalam) and those who talked on the side of Vali rendered some unacceptable blames on Ram. They concluded by saying Ravan had many good qualities than Ram, seriously😡. From that day, I stopped watching debate on Ramayan.😆

Bang on post👍🏼

Originally posted by: --Naina-

Bang on post👍🏼

Tweet this thread to CVS please..😆