Have A Look....

especially after 1.20

P.S
no offense please.

hmm, so what? even if the scene was copied from a hollywood movie, i think it was better than the original. and i am not offended.

it's not about Copy or inspiration. but is it necessary for Ramayana?really upsetting.

Originally posted by: NavyaKavya30

I am ok with it... If the copy is better than the original then I am ok with it.Regarding how exactly the events unfolded at that precise moment in Ramayana ...hmm...well ... no one was sitting with a pen and paper to note down the EXACT details so if the CVs have come up with something like this then atleast I don't have any complaints ... I would have had problem if taadka wasn't killed by Ram...so long as the CVs are following the main crucial events , I am ok with it.

that's the main problem here. here CVS not trying to make scene for Ramayana but altering Ramayana for Their inspiration scenes.in fact, if they read Ramayana properly, they'll become inspiration for other's in visualization.

After seeing the clip I feel proud of the CVs who r able to recreate an Hollywood clip in a television show which will suit the situation without altering the original essence of the track.

It was still a good scene. In no way did it degrade any of the characters or change any crucial events. As long as the dignity of the characters and the epic isn't harmed I'm okay with the show.

just few days ago, There was Debate(should I say War) for did CVS copy Bahubali act? "CVS are wah!blah! they're damn genius to create Ramayana scenes". "They don't have to copy from any dumbs."," 47 Ronin" released two years ago.Ram vs Tadaka scene may inspired from that movie. even it didn't, that doesn't matter here. But , Here most of us concluded that scene as inspired. Similarly, When waterfall scene shown, someone in the forum felt that was inspired from Bahubali. suddenly so many oppositions how can she/he feel like that. in fact she/he criticized visualization of scene not VFX effects. none can deny CVS are experts in visual effects. But story? Honestly this forum lacks in mutual consent. in this forum two types of people here, first SKR lovers, second labelled as SKR haters. because there is no SKR haters. Just because first one couldn't see our love on Ramayana,we labeled as SKR haters. What should we call them? Ramayana haters? rubbish. Without Illustration, we have been fan of Ramayana. You have rights to express your opinions. at same time, respect other's opinions. And more than that, sometimes Ramayana followers may post in some topics for questions based on some distorted facts. of course, there is distortion thread, we won't comment unnecessarily. if we do, it's immoral. no doubt it. but remember, this forum also about mythological. so please never misjudge those characters by what shown in the soap. That will make Ramayana followers to reply, otherwise no problem. But anyone can question your doubts, opinions to us, we will get happy either your doubts clear if you have or clear our misconception if we have. Happy new year to all.

my policy is simple, naa kaahu dosti naa kahu se bair. i am watching this show without any prjudices or any expectations about anything.

I feel that if our mythological characters were so great that they could fight the demons and free the world from their clutches, then why not enhance or glorify their acts by the use of spl effects...
Our young generations prefer watching Holywood movies instead of epics like Ramayana or Mahabharat...
If with the addition of spl effect the young audience also get attracted towards our epics which are much more great than anything on this earth then I think there is nothing wrong...

Purely my views