{|Siya ke Ram - Episode Distortion & Frustration Thread 1|} - Page 3

Dashrath's character is becoming worse by the day. 🤬 What are the CVs playing at, making him accuse his wives for their childlessness and willfully breaking the promise he'd made to King Ashvapathi? SP's Dashrath is becoming more and more like their Drupad from Starbharat, when neither were in fact that evil.

Very worthy thread at useless place.we can point out faults at real diamond but what is the use to point faults on fake one. If this show makes mistakes, we can rectify but if show itself is mistake, there is nothing to do. Honestly I had no interest on cast,I watched this show only because it's about Ramayana. Some People claiming that this show meant for Sita's perspective, i'm really sorry. I was also interested much to watch because Sita's perspective. But let me give my POV about Sita's perspective. In real Ramayana, Mata Sita respected as much as Ram. But sadly Ramayana adaptations (movies and soaps) highly ignored Sita's conversation with others. Especially Ram-Sita conversation at two places one before exile and another before Agni Pariksha. Most importantly, Sita's taunt about Ram as woman. Those conversation was note to understand Why Sita is true soul mate? But later adaptations turned Sita character as dumb wife. So I wanted to see Sita's unexplored conversations in this show. But what else I can expect from DKDM crew. In DKDM Ramayana version is unbearable.Raavan and Ram both attending Sita Swayamwar at same time. Ram hands were shivering because he was reluctant to break His Lord bow. Only after Shiv permission, Ram broke it. I won't get surprise, in SKR Sita was very much aware that she can kill Raavan by single slap. She refused to do because jobless Ram destined to do. I agree following completely is uneasy one. In fact Ram married at teen.Ram went exile late 20's.14 years exile and 11000 years as King. But our daily soap Ram was young and fresh from marriage to death. But story was never altered much. They tried their best to show what mentioned in Rama Charita Mqnas. There are shows "Bajrang Bali","Suryaputra Karn",blah,blah,blah , but people don't complaint about that because we know that show intentions are to praise respective characters but this show should have been about Ramayana. If they made show about Sita,I wouldn't complain even if Ram become abusive Husband. Why they bring Ramayana in this picture? I think we don't have to prove Ramayana epic by arguing over SKR. Ramayana has 300 versions and 3000 mocking versions. SKR is 3001th. Rest SKR. This is my opinion,No offense please.

did dashrath really break his promise of making bharath the king?

Well there have been many adaptations of Ramayana and it is mentioned in one of them that when Rama was to be crowned king of ayodhya before his exile, both bharat and shatrughan were in kaikeya. So I guess this storyline is going the same direction.

Yes , the one thing I find confusing here is that it was shown that sita goes to maharishi gautams ashram for her studies, but yesterday she said she studied in maharishi yagyavars ashram. I'm a little confused here.

See there are many versions of Ramayan. What is wrong in seeing a new interpretation. Who are we to tell what is right, what is wrong. We didn't live in the Valmiki era or vyasa era. What we know is also hearsay.

@neelakshi as per the story I don't know whether Bharat or Shatrugna went to Kekeya before marriage. But what I know is that during Swayamavar only Ram and Lakhan are there. As they reach mithila travelling with sage vishwamitra. And when ram wins the hand of sita, news is send to Ayodhya about the joyous occasion. The family from Ayodhya comes and sage vishwamitra and vashista suggests that the 4 princes marry the 4 princess and the marriage happens.