🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: Match 19 - Final: India vs Pakistan @Dubai🏏
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread- 29th Sept 2025.
BOOTH ROAMING 28.9
PAAV PHISLAA 29.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 29 Sep 2025 EDT
🎶🎵Tribute to Lata Mangeshkar on Her 96th Birth Anniversary🎵🎶
Geetanjali to die?
And Janhvi gives another flop!!
India Won Asia Cup 2025- Trophy Missing! Glory Without the Trophy?
Maan and Geet- Love Wins Against All Odds..
101 ways to patau your pati
Aishwarya Rai at the Paris fashion week
Bhagwan Ke Charnon Mein Swarg
✦ Font-astic Voyage Contest Voting Round 1 | Invites ONLY ✦
Trump's 100% tariff on Bollywood films
Kshiti, very good take 5 from you, on today's episode
Discrimination against daughters is rampant even today,And this episode highlighted that very wellBut how true is this version of the story, I have my doubtsOf course, the writers can take the creative liberty to interpret it in a different way!
Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..
Don't take this episode for face value. It is totally and completely FALSE and whoever wrote the script for today's episode should be ashamed of themselves for showing such lies.
I hope the CVs are happy. They have now destroyed Maharaj Dashrath's character beyond redemption, showing him as a man who sacrificed his daughter to have a son, which NEVER HAPPENED. 😡 The adoption of Shanta had nothing to do with having sons. She was given to Romapada, Dashrath's best friend and Dashrath's own brother-in-law, during her infancy. She grew up in her maasi's family, and it was many many years later that she married Rishyashringa and he did the putrakameshti yagna.Today's entire episode was a total joke. From the very beginning, the CVs glorified Maharaj Janak by degrading Maharaj Dashrath, and now they have gone an ultimate low by showing Dashrath as a daughter-hating man.Do the CVs know that when Ram got married to Sita, Dashrath shed tears of happiness and said to Kaushalya that God has filled the void of not having any daughters, by giving him four daughters-in-law?Yes, he wanted an heir for his dynasty, but he had no animosity towards female children.Shame on you CVs! You have destroyed Ramayan today.
Kshiti, very good take 5 from you, on today's episode
Discrimination against daughters is rampant even today,And this episode highlighted that very wellBut how true is this version of the story, I have my doubtsOf course, the writers can take the creative liberty to interpret it in a different way!
Originally posted by: Muggle_Diaries
Hi,I really can understand your outrage.However, since hundreds of years there are many versions of Mahabharata and Ramayana. There is really no 'correct' version or 'right' version of it. All are different interpretation of the same story.Now coming to Shanta's story. Please do read 'Sita' from Devdutta Patnayak (also 'Jaya' which is a Mahabharata story). He is the subject expertise and also has researched the stories of Mahabharat and Ramayana across India and have gone through many versions of it which are in place since centuries.Also, instead of just waiting or expecting to read the version we are already familiar with, let us try to understand and enjoy other versions and interpretations also. For me, understanding the hidden meanings and lessons from these Epics, which are in turn stories of mankind is most important rather than expend my energy in thinking what I am seeing is the 'Right' version of it. I hope you understand this point of view as well. I do appreciate you taking your time and expressing your view.LoveKshithi
Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..
If we always justify such stories by calling them "different interpretations", then anyone can create anything and pass it off as research. Heck, even I can write my own Ramayan and do whatever I want with the characters, and claim that I did lots of "research" from "other versions".Sorry, this doesn't sit well with me. There may be many versions, but in the end of the day, the truly authentic ones are the ones written by sages who lived through these epics, who were contemporaries of Ram and Krishna, and who saw everything as it happened. Anything else is a mere interpretation, but it cannot be passed off as authentic.Different stories are acceptable as long as they don't change the personalities of the characters, but once they make positive characters negative and blame them for a serious crime like selling off their daughter, it's totally unacceptable.