Budding Friendship - March 15 - Page 7

Originally posted by: pranurosid

I can see a very strict father version of two kids in Mishti and Mother version in Ruhaan who makes them understand the things with calm and composure..That's a weird thought but sorry can't help it 😆

Originally posted by: sweetzzz

Today's episode.made it very clear that ruhaan sees Pari as a good friend. The buddy Wala hi-fi!!

Pari might be effected by ruhaan but then she would definitely end up with arnav. She sees him as a person to go to for all her problems. You see how we reach out to someone within family for a few things than to our best friends??

Mishti is afraid that she might fall for him and break her commitment to veer and thats why she does all that chid chid.. she is very possessive with siblings and doesn't like others I. It reminded me of how she used to take care of young park along with ishaan during ML track

In the precap Pari said ruhaan mujhe acha lagta hai yaar doesn't really have to be taken as an infatuation. She might as well say he is a good guy, not bad like Mishti or arnav thinks he is!!

I have to say this, the story is moving quite fast this season. May be the limited episodes is doing wonders

Originally posted by: Nandy141

Lol you called Ruhaan a mother to the kids ??? Here there is a Rihaan ship sailing ..

Kinda true yaar..They are actually running a family in their own ways ..

Better version Ya 👏

Originally posted by: pranurosid

That's how I felt..The jagada about towel between MisHaan like typical hubby-wife and Mishti yelling at Pari like a responsible father and Ruhaan guiding Pari and Ansh into right path with calm and composer giving me vibes of Mother's version 😆

Originally posted by: Nandy141

I m totally loving your version ..It's more logical too..⭐️😆

Originally posted by: pranurosid

May be u r right..If Mishti Khanna cries ,then few ppl be like she got a happy life why should she cry😛

Isn't mishti Malhotra-Khanna differentiation provocating?

Mishti is mishti be it Malhotra or Khanna.. For some she is Mauhaan's baby, for some she is Maunal's (biological) n for some she is Mauli's.. And all who loved Mauli are gonna love her too regardless of last name. She is loved by most..

Frankly as of now, all characters are loved. During discussions up-downs happens cuz of different perspectives but I don't think anyone is actually being hated as of now..

It's not viewers fault that Mishti's character was not explored earlier. Now it has started, we r getting more insights slowly.. so Ofcourse everyone will understand mishti properly..

Originally posted by: Ruhi122

Isn't mishti Malhotra-Khanna differentiation provocating?

Mishti is mishti be it Malhotra or Khanna.. For some she is Mauhaan's baby, for some she is Maunal's (biological) n for some she is Mauli's.. And all who loved Mauli are gonna love her too regardless of last name. She is loved by most..

Frankly as of now, all characters are loved. During discussions up-downs happens cuz of different perspectives but I don't think anyone is actually being hated as of now..

It's not viewers fault that Mishti's character was not explored earlier. Now it has started, we r getting more insights slowly.. so Ofcourse everyone will understand mishti properly..

What's provocating is actually thinking that a young female character who has lost her parents very young , had a perfect life. That is actually provocating . What you see now is just a result of that provocation. The logic was since Mishti got the Papa of her choice her life was perfect so what if she lost her parents young, her life is still perfect. That was the provacating logic given by some. By. that logic if Mishti hadn't gotten Papa of her choice then she would have been a Malhotra and hence her life wouldn't have been perfect. So I think the above statement is correct considering the earlier provocation. I am sorry nobody should need an insight into a character to know that losing parents at a young age makes life awful and not perfect. Basic human empathy should tell us that. I would say problem is with the actual provocation and not the result.

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

What's provocating is actually thinking that a young female character who has lost her parents very young , had a perfect life. That is actually provocating . What you see now is just a result of that provocation. The logic was since Mishti got the Papa of her choice her life was perfect so what if she lost her parents young, her life is still perfect. That was the provacating logic given by some. By. that logic if Mishti hadn't gotten Papa of her choice then she would have been a Malhotra and hence her life wouldn't have been perfect. So I think the above statement is correct considering the earlier provocation. I am sorry nobody should need an insight into a character to know that losing parents at a young age makes life awful and not perfect. Basic human empathy should tell us that. I would say problem is with the actual provocation and not the result.

I don't think anyone said PERFECT LIFE. The story showed Pari's pain n her character was being explored then. Ppl had started literally comparing Mishti's pain then.. Arrey let the makers show... give time... It was obvious that all 3 kids lost parents so they were all dealing differently. 2-3 episodes back, her character was not explored yet n ppl were talking abt her pain.. most ppl connect with what's shown. Rest all is theories.
As of today's tear, who apart from 2-3 MISHTI KHANNA supporters talked abt it? It's not like we don't talk so we didn't notice, right?
Frankly, there are only few differentiating between last names n sperm donors! Most I see are watching neutrally, liking all characters equally as of now..
Biggest fact remains, let alone last season male leads, mishti is Mauli's daughter so we all love her. Assuming that ppl are being biased cuz of last name is sheer one-sided thinking.

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

What's provocating is actually thinking that a young female character who has lost her parents very young , had a perfect life. That is actually provocating . What you see now is just a result of that provocation. The logic was since Mishti got the Papa of her choice her life was perfect so what if she lost her parents young, her life is still perfect. That was the provacating logic given by some. By. that logic if Mishti hadn't gotten Papa of her choice then she would have been a Malhotra and hence her life wouldn't have been perfect. So I think the above statement is correct considering the earlier provocation. I am sorry nobody should need an insight into a character to know that losing parents at a young age makes life awful and not perfect. Basic human empathy should tell us that. I would say problem is with the actual provocation and not the result.

Originally posted by: sweet_tania

Bold is beautiful 👏👏👏

There was a post on mishti's imaginary pain .

From S2 episode 1 , they have highlighted mishti's pain to viewers . Some connected with it instantly while other takes time to understand it .

Still most beautiful part of s2 is siblings bond . Mishti is protective and possessive for ansh and pari both , she loves them a lot vice versa pari and ansh respect and obey her because they also loves her a lot .It is ok to have less communication than less care and love .I just wish gajra don't ruin this beautiful bond for a guy because they are not having parents now , this family of 4 is everything for each other .