Is accepting a cheating husband back regressive? - Page 2

Originally posted by: prettywomaniya

@sabhyata -- such a nice post!!

u know i have kinda ditto feelings..

i supported mauli when she wanted him back pre leap.. i said the same lines in her defence that accepting a cheater husband takes a lot .. like a lot of courage and its a strong thing..

for that one needs to keep ones ego aside , self respect aside and its a big deal for a woman like mauli.. so it was nothing weak or even regressive!!

but as u said , its not only cheating but many other things which makes me feel that now mauli shouldnt take him back. and i believe that she will not..

nice post😊

Hope so and even if Kunal and Mauli do get toghether I hope it's written properly and in a convincing manner without compromising on Mauli's integrity and self respect. But personally I think they are going towards Mauli and Kunal reunion.

How is accepting a cheater,abuser,backstabber a strong thing...it is a weakness...kunal's love is mouli's weakness..she was ready to take Kunal without any apology or regret...whole life she should live with fact that Kunal true love is nandini...only fools will think kunal still loves Mouli and nandini was attraction...he doesn't love her...he only felt guilty due to Mishti...it will be purely a compromise from both Kunal and mouli.

Dhoka is a crime. You are breaking "Trust" of a person. No matter what the relationship is...Dhoka is CRIME and it should not be forgiven.
Accepting a cheater is not regressive...no matter who it is husband, wife, friend, lover, son father, mother...doesn't matter.

However you may forgive...but can't forget. If you can't forget...that means You don't "TRUST". When there is no trust relationship is more like dead body. 🤢 How can you love a dead body???

I just wanna know one thing about the reference you gave here. Is there any written or video documentation how Clinton's husband behaved with her while cheating? Not trying to offend anyone but just want to know about it, because as you think that cheating and accepting back is justified,so wanna know about it properly,the grounds if judgement and comparison. If you have time to elaborate please do.

Honestly most people who stay with cheating partner in the limelight can't be compared to us common folks. There is a power play,image and lots of money n property involved. The woman in a high profile marriage may feel it's stupid to let go of all the riches n let the mistress win. But it can end brutally too .walking out is the best option Imo. Look atDiana,she was suffocated n so sad when she was with Charles, knowing he desires someone else. After she left him she was so much freer.

The writers are trying to justify EMA. So they never made him realise his mistakes. Now he is some Mahaan human who is trying to reunite ishaan and mouli by trying to be negative.

Originally posted by: tanvismile

The writers are trying to justify EMA. So they never made him realise his mistakes. Now he is some Mahaan human who is trying to reunite ishaan and mouli by trying to be negative.

Originally posted by: Silpa91

Don't know about regressive or not.But i think if a woman accepts her cheater husband back she can never be happy.She won't be able to trust her again there will always be doubts and fear of the same thing happening again.And most importantly the relationship won't be the same again.So i dont think cheater husband should be accepted back.She should forgive him and be friendly with him but should not accept back as a husband.

In this show Kunal went beyond an EMA ...he fell in love with nandu and divorced Mauli and married nandu and had a child with her . He didn't want Mauli Anymore once he fell for nandu. And at present he is nAndus husband or widower ...he belongs. To nandu...so it's not like Mauli accepting her cheating husband back ...because he is not her husband ..?He's nAndus husband .. so the correct question is can Mauli take back a man who rejected her and didn't want her anymore once he had his great love and is Mauli willing to be his second option..

I think there's s big difference between a cheating husband ..who had an EMA but is sorry about it, and he does not want to end his marriage and still wants to be with his wife. The Clinton's were mentioned here...he was like the typical cheating husband ..had an EMA for fun...but never tried to divorce his wife and still wanted to be in the marriage ..so here the wife can schedule whether to forgive or not because the husband still chose the wife over the other woman. The wife and marriage was not rejected. But in kunals case ...he chose the other woman ..he didn't want his wife anymore ..in fact he didn't want the marriage anymore , he rejected both ...so in this case Mauli taking Kunal back after he threw her away and rejected her ..it's a tough one due to pride and self respect ..